It was correct as far as it went (as are all scientific theories), however it predicted the electrons would all practically instantly spiral into the nucleus while the atom emitted an intense flash of x-rays and gamma rays, which obviously does not happen.
It took the addition of Heisenberg's Quantum theory to explain why the electrons stay in "fixed" orbitals and allow the prediction of hydrogen's spectral lines. This combined theory was more correct, and with only minor modifications is the modern atomic theory.
was wandering the smae thing but i think they just developed rutherfords theory by doing the gold foil experiment in depth
the evidence that the phlogistan theory was correct was that there was heat and by the way this is definetly correct
Ar2 and Cu2 are incorrect; neither argon nor copper forms diatomic molecules. The others listed are correct.
It depends. If the Theory is correct, changing is a weakness. If the Theory is incorrect,changing is a strength.
yes it was tested by the gold foil experiment
If a scientist were being modest, then yes. But a true theory is backed up by scientific data and observation. So your answer is Incorrect.
he found faults in the atomic theory of jj Thompson
Scientific theorums are normally discarded after they have been proven to be wrong after a series of testing to verify if the theory was correct or not. Scientific theorums can take years, sometimes decades to be proven to be correct or incorrect.
The words fruits when pluralized is correct not incorrect.
According to Thomson's atomic theory, the mass of an atom was special evenly throughout its volume. Errest Rutherford's experiment proved this wrong.
re-notate? In the context of music theory, it would mean to notate an additional time. Possibly to correct in an incorrect notation.