Contention + evidence = warrant. -Apex.
Logic and evidence are the two key elements that should be used in the right proportion to build an effective argument. Logic helps to structure the argument and ensure it is coherent and rational, while evidence provides support for the claims made within the argument. Finding the right balance between these elements is crucial for crafting a persuasive and compelling argument.
An electron model is a good approximation of the behavior of electrons in certain macroscopic phenomena, such as electricity and magnetism. It helps to explain how electrons move in a circuit or interact with magnetic fields. However, in more complex quantum phenomena, the electron model may not accurately represent the behavior of electrons.
A explanation for why a past event happened apex
An air freshener is a good model of diffusion because it releases molecules into the air that spread out evenly through the room due to random motion. This mirrors the process of diffusion where particles move from an area of high concentration to an area of low concentration until equilibrium is reached.
In 1808, an English school teacher, John Dalton proposed an explanatioin for the 3 laws of how compounds are formed. 1. Law of Conservation of Mass 2. Law of Definite Proportions 3. Law of Multiple Proportions
Contention + evidence = warrant. -Apex.
in an argument
There is a diagram that can help understand. The diagram is in an argument.
Contention + evidence = warrant. -Apex.
Contention + evidence = warrant
According to Toulmin's model of argumentation, a good argument should consist of a claim, evidence to support the claim, reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim, and acknowledgment of potential counterarguments. This structure helps to strengthen the argument and make it more convincing and well-supported.
There is no argument - it happened.
I believe that argument is good for a good friendship as you can freely say what you feel and there is no restrictions..
how and why
A good salesman is the one who can made a rational argument from irrational argument...
Aristotle's main argument against the heliocentric model proposed by Aristarchus was that it did not align with his belief in a geocentric universe centered around the Earth. He based his argument on the apparent lack of observable stellar parallax, which he believed would be present if the Earth were in motion around the Sun.
An invalid argument is when the facts you are using are invalid or your forms of defense are wrong or incorrect, a valid argument is the opposite of an invalid argument. "There is a windmill in my beard. your argument is invalid." (This is a good example of a bad contradiction)