There is a dense, positively charged mass in the center of an atom.
To determine whether Fleming's hypothesis should be supported or rejected based on an experiment, one would need to analyze the results of the experiment in relation to the hypothesis. If the data from the experiment aligns with the predictions made by Fleming's hypothesis, then it should be supported. However, if the results contradict the hypothesis, it may need to be rejected or revised.
The part of the scientific method that is based on the results of an experiment is drawing conclusions. This step involves analyzing the data collected during the experiment to determine whether the hypothesis is supported or not.
One assumption based on this experiment could be that the results observed in a controlled laboratory setting would be similar to those in a real-world scenario.
A clear statement of a hypothesis is critical as it provides a specific testable prediction for the experiment. It helps define the purpose of the study and guides the research process, allowing for the collection of relevant data to either support or reject the hypothesis. Clarity in the hypothesis also ensures that the results obtained from the experiment are meaningful and can lead to valid conclusions.
The last step in an experiment is to analyze the data collected during the experiment to draw conclusions and determine if the hypothesis was supported or not. This analysis helps to understand the results and assess the significance of the findings.
The results of Rutherford's gold foil experiment supported the model of an atom with a small, positively charged nucleus at its center, surrounded by mostly empty space where electrons orbit. This experiment led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.
The most surprising fact about Rutherford's experiment is that some of the atoms bounced backwards while others scattered.
The answer you predict before starting the experiment is your hypothesis.
That is not a statement it is a question
Rutherford's gold foil experiment demonstrated that atoms have a small, dense nucleus at their center, which contains most of the atom's mass, while the majority of the atom is empty space. This was evidenced by the deflection of alpha particles, indicating that a positive charge is concentrated in a tiny volume. The experiment led to the conclusion that the atomic structure is not a uniform sphere, as previously thought, but rather a nucleus surrounded by orbiting electrons. This fundamentally changed the understanding of atomic structure.
No
false
To determine whether Fleming's hypothesis should be supported or rejected based on an experiment, one would need to analyze the results of the experiment in relation to the hypothesis. If the data from the experiment aligns with the predictions made by Fleming's hypothesis, then it should be supported. However, if the results contradict the hypothesis, it may need to be rejected or revised.
The part of the scientific method that is based on the results of an experiment is drawing conclusions. This step involves analyzing the data collected during the experiment to determine whether the hypothesis is supported or not.
The observed results were in line with the expected results, indicating that the hypothesis was supported. This suggests that the experiment was conducted correctly and the variables were controlled effectively.
To determine whether the experiment supported or rejected the hypothesis, it is essential to analyze the data collected during the experiment. If the results align with the predictions made by the hypothesis, then it can be considered supported. Conversely, if the results contradict these predictions, the hypothesis would be rejected. A detailed examination of the evidence is necessary for a definitive conclusion.
No, I believe that would be a hypothesis. A prediction would be forecasting the unknown without the assistance of the results.