After forming a hypothesis, the next step in the scientific method is to design and conduct an experiment to test the hypothesis. This involves collecting data and analyzing the results to determine if the hypothesis is supported or refuted.
They share the results of the experiment.
Gold was chosen for Rutherford's experiment because it is a malleable metal that can be made into extremely thin foils, allowing alpha particles to be passed through easily. Additionally, gold atoms have a high atomic number which results in a denser concentration of positive charge in the nucleus, making it ideal for studying the structure of atoms.
The information collected during an experiment is called data. This data is used to analyze the results of the experiment and draw conclusions based on the findings.
True. In an experiment, a scientist formulates a hypothesis, designs the experiment, collects data, and then analyzes the results to draw conclusions. The outcome of the experiment is not known beforehand, and it is the results of the experiment that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
The gold foil experiment supported the statement that atoms have a small, positively charged nucleus at their center. This overturned the previous "plum pudding" model of the atom, where positive charge was thought to be spread throughout the atom.
The results of Rutherford's gold foil experiment supported the model of an atom with a small, positively charged nucleus at its center, surrounded by mostly empty space where electrons orbit. This experiment led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.
The most surprising fact about Rutherford's experiment is that some of the atoms bounced backwards while others scattered.
The answer you predict before starting the experiment is your hypothesis.
That is not a statement it is a question
No
false
To determine whether Fleming's hypothesis should be supported or rejected based on an experiment, one would need to analyze the results of the experiment in relation to the hypothesis. If the data from the experiment aligns with the predictions made by Fleming's hypothesis, then it should be supported. However, if the results contradict the hypothesis, it may need to be rejected or revised.
The part of the scientific method that is based on the results of an experiment is drawing conclusions. This step involves analyzing the data collected during the experiment to determine whether the hypothesis is supported or not.
The observed results were in line with the expected results, indicating that the hypothesis was supported. This suggests that the experiment was conducted correctly and the variables were controlled effectively.
To determine whether the experiment supported or rejected the hypothesis, it is essential to analyze the data collected during the experiment. If the results align with the predictions made by the hypothesis, then it can be considered supported. Conversely, if the results contradict these predictions, the hypothesis would be rejected. A detailed examination of the evidence is necessary for a definitive conclusion.
No, I believe that would be a hypothesis. A prediction would be forecasting the unknown without the assistance of the results.