answersLogoWhite

0

A scientific theory cannot be proven correct because there is no way to look into the future and find out if the theory is ever revised. Theories tend to change greatly as new discoveries are made.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Chemistry

How can a scientific theory be proved true?

Bluntly, the answer is no. There are serious philosophical and logical problems with some of the underlying assumptions that one has to make in order to conclude that a theory is true. They are numerous and complex, and some study in the philosophy of science will bring some of this in perspective. Basically, all of science amounts to a heuristic-- a system that aids in the solution of various kinds of problems, but which is itself unverifiable and unprovable as valid. This should not be troubling. As long as people exist and remain curious about the world, they will ask questions and develop various ways to approach the answsers. In the long run, concepts with greater and greater predictive strength will develop, and they will lead to more questions. Ideally, some observable progress (at least from the point of view of the practitioners) will follow. People will, of course, ask questions based on what they can observe, and they will make conclusions based on their heuristic methods of observation. But absolute truth will ultimately elude us.One example of this heuristic is the idea that a theory must be falsifiable in order to be 'scientific' (as opposed to non-scientific). There are some serious reasons to doubt that falsifiability is a valid demarcation between science and non-science. One idea is that in order to claim that a theory is falsifiable, one must appeal to another theory, or set of heuristic observations, in order to do so. Since no theory can be proven to be absolutely true, what happens to the theory that falsifiability properly demarcates between science and non-science? This theory itself is part of the unvalidatable heuristic.For those of us who are deeply curious, this is reason for intense excitement. There will probably always be a reason to suspect (and sometimes even discover) new and world-changing views of reality. A good example is the progression of theories from Aristotle to Galileo, Newton, Einstein, and Bohr and the world of Quantum theory and mechanics. Theories always represent a creative tension between one theory and another theory/theories, NOT a tension between a theory and a prevailing body of actual fact. Everything is questionable.Alternative2:A scientific Theory can be "true" in the sense that it describes and predicts the way nature behaves. For example the Conservation of Electromagnetic Fields, 0=XB, decribes the behavior of electromagnetic fields: 0 = [db/dr -DEL.B, dB/dr + DEL b] = [db/dt - DEL.E, dB/dt + DEL e].The Book of Nature is written in mathematics and Mathematical Theories can truly describe nature, and in so doing are "True" Theories.Alternative 3:Whether expressed in mathematic terms or not all "true" theories are called Laws.


What scientist said all matter is made of atoms?

The scientist who proposed that all matter is made of atoms was John Dalton in the early 19th century. His atomic theory revolutionized the field of chemistry and laid the foundation for modern atomic and molecular theory.


What scientist said all matter is made up of atoms?

The scientist who proposed that all matter is made up of atoms was John Dalton, known for his atomic theory in the early 19th century. Dalton's theory stated that all elements are made up of tiny indivisible particles called atoms.


What scientist said matter is made of atoms?

The scientist who first proposed that matter is made of atoms was John Dalton, in the early 19th century. Dalton developed atomic theory to explain chemical reactions and the behavior of gases.


What is the definition of the positive attitude of a scientist towards failure?

A positive attitude of a scientist towards failure involves seeing it as a learning opportunity, a chance to refine hypotheses or experimental methods, and a step towards progress. Embracing failure can lead to insights and breakthroughs in scientific research.

Related Questions

Why are scientific theories said to be just a theory?

People tend to say that scientific theories are "just" a theory because of a confusion between the common usage of "theory" and the scientific definition. (In everyday speech people often use the word "theory" in the sense of a "hunch" or "vague idea". This is not what the word means in a scientific context). A scientific theory is deduced from observations and is the simplest way of describing natural phenomena. It is testable, observable, predictable, and falsifiable. Scientific theories are not the same thing as hypotheses, which are explanations that haven't been demonstrated or verified. A scientific theory has evidence to back it up. The common usage of 'theory' suggests an explanation that someone hasn't proven, or isn't able to prove. It doesn't imply evidence that has been tested; it doesn't imply predictability. When someone hears, for example, "Big Bang theory" or "the theory of evolution", they may hear the word 'theory' and associate those scientific theories with someone's opinion or suggestion. In reality, these theories are the best scientific explanations for a myriad of phenomena across multiple scientific definitions. In science, "just a theory" is a very good place to be.


Are scientific theories based on scientific evidence?

By not being so much based on fact as explaining said facts. That is what scientific theories do, explain the facts and laws contained within them as far as possible. For example; evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains much, not everything, about the fact of evolution.


In science what distinguishes a hypothesis from a theory?

A Hypothesis is a statement or objective one has set out to test or query. eg An unsupported object will fall when dropped. This can be proved or disproved through experimentation. After testing the above hypothesis multiple times (with a scientific method) one can deduce the statement that all unsupported objects fall when dropped. Through more study one can form a scientific theory to explain the happenings in the experimentation. Using the about example the theory of Gravity and its effect on objects can be formed. A scientific theory can be disproven after formation. TLDR: first comes unproven hypothesis, then after experimentation a scientific theory is formed.


Is evolutions falsificationable?

Falsifiable. Yes. As a famous population biologist once said, " show me fossil bunnies in the Pre-Cambrian and you will have falsified evolution. " All scientific facts are falsifiable as well as all scientific theories. It once was a " fact " that the world was flat and it once was a theory that the universe was in steady state. Both falsified. Of course, no one has falsified evolution the fact, or the theory of evolution by natural selection.


What is the scientific name of clostridium botulinum?

You just said it.


Why is heliocentric theory important?

It was the first theory that said that the universe does not revolve around the Earth; instead we revolve around the sun. It discredited many people's theories and modern belief at the time. It is also the proven theory that we believe in today.


What is the meaning of scientific failure?

When an experiment contradicts the outcome predicted by a theory, the theory is said to be a failure. The experiment itself, if poorly designed or conducted, may not achieve a result to distinguish between expected outcomes, in which case the experiment would be a failure. Even negative results in science have meaning. Failure generally leads to greater insight than does success, as flaws is theory reveal the need for improved theories.


What does the word theory mean?

If you look in a dictionary you will see a lot of big words and concepts when you look up the word theory. In lay terms a theory is an "educated guess" about a idea or issue or science concept. Example: The Darwin Theory. He "guessed" that we "evolved" from the amoeba all the way up to the humanity we have now. He said it was only a theory and it was an unproven one despite the people who came to believe it was a fact. Theories are ideas that have to be disproven or proven using scientific methods or educated methods.


What does the word theory?

If you look in a dictionary you will see a lot of big words and concepts when you look up the word theory. In lay terms a theory is an "educated guess" about a idea or issue or science concept. Example: The Darwin Theory. He "guessed" that we "evolved" from the amoeba all the way up to the humanity we have now. He said it was only a theory and it was an unproven one despite the people who came to believe it was a fact. Theories are ideas that have to be disproven or proven using scientific methods or educated methods.


Is the evolutionary theory bankrupt?

Absolutely not. The Theory of Evolution is the accepted scientific theory of how living things evolved on this planet. If you're looking for a "bankrupt" theory a serious contender would be the unscientific theory of Creationism. It has absolutely no scientific currency to support it. However, as Ayn Rand said so eloquently: Those who deny reason cannot be conquered by it.


How does mill defend his theory when charged that hedonism is a theory for swine?

He said it is not me and my theories, it is you and yours. You who accuse my theories for swine, represent the human nature in a degrading light. Since the accusation supposes human beings to be capable of no pleasures execpt those of which swine are capable. -We laiter came to find this supposition to be fale.


What is scientific definition of triple beam balance?

What you just said,duh