By not being so much based on fact as explaining said facts. That is what scientific theories do, explain the facts and laws contained within them as far as possible. For example; evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains much, not everything, about the fact of evolution.
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
why are theories sometimes replaced by new theories
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena, based on a body of evidence and observations. They are formulated through rigorous testing and can be modified or refined as new evidence emerges. Unlike hypotheses, which are tentative explanations, theories are widely accepted within the scientific community when they withstand extensive scrutiny and experimentation. Importantly, theories do not become "true" in an absolute sense; rather, they are supported by evidence and are the best available explanations at the time.
Scientific theories and everyday theories both serve to explain and predict phenomena based on observations and experiences. They are both built on patterns and evidence, allowing individuals to make sense of the world around them. However, scientific theories are rigorously tested and peer-reviewed, while everyday theories may rely more on personal experience and anecdotal evidence. Despite this difference in rigor, both types of theories help people navigate and understand their environments.
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena based on a body of evidence and are subject to testing and refinement. They are not mere guesses but rather comprehensive frameworks that can predict outcomes and are supported by repeated experimentation. Importantly, scientific theories can evolve as new evidence emerges, differentiating them from laws, which describe observable phenomena without explaining why they occur. Overall, theories are foundational to scientific understanding and must withstand rigorous scrutiny.
Scientific evidence supports scientific theories through empirical observations, experiments, and data analysis that consistently confirm the predictions and explanations of the theories. Theories are continuously tested and revised based on new evidence, leading to a more refined and accurate understanding of the natural world. Overall, the robustness and validity of scientific theories are demonstrated through the process of evidence accumulation and verification by multiple independent researchers.
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
why are theories sometimes replaced by new theories
Scientists call theories that explain all the evidence and are widely accepted by the scientific community "well-established theories" or "well-supported theories." These theories are based on a large body of evidence and have withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.
Personal beliefs or opinions are not a result of scientific theory. Scientific theories are based on empirical evidence and reasoning, not on subjective views or perspectives.
Scientific theories are connected to observations and evidence through the process of hypothesis testing. Scientists use observations and evidence to develop hypotheses, which are then tested through experiments and further observations. If the results support the hypothesis, it can become a theory. Theories are constantly refined and updated based on new evidence and observations.
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena, based on a body of evidence and observations. They are formulated through rigorous testing and can be modified or refined as new evidence emerges. Unlike hypotheses, which are tentative explanations, theories are widely accepted within the scientific community when they withstand extensive scrutiny and experimentation. Importantly, theories do not become "true" in an absolute sense; rather, they are supported by evidence and are the best available explanations at the time.
SCIENTIFIC:The things which are based on any rules and regulations are called scientific..UNSCIENTIFIC:The things which does not based upon any rule or regulations are unscientific..
Scientific theories and everyday theories both serve to explain and predict phenomena based on observations and experiences. They are both built on patterns and evidence, allowing individuals to make sense of the world around them. However, scientific theories are rigorously tested and peer-reviewed, while everyday theories may rely more on personal experience and anecdotal evidence. Despite this difference in rigor, both types of theories help people navigate and understand their environments.
theories. They are statements or, in this case, laws that explain the phenomenon of motion based on empirical evidence and mathematical formulations.
Scientific theories are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena based on a body of evidence and are subject to testing and refinement. They are not mere guesses but rather comprehensive frameworks that can predict outcomes and are supported by repeated experimentation. Importantly, scientific theories can evolve as new evidence emerges, differentiating them from laws, which describe observable phenomena without explaining why they occur. Overall, theories are foundational to scientific understanding and must withstand rigorous scrutiny.