Answer- Flames in atomic emission are more sensitive to flame instability because optimum excitation conditions vary widely from element to element. High temperatures are needed for excitation of some elements and low temperatures for others. The region of flame that gives rise to optimum line intensities varies from element to element. Flame is rarely use in atomic emission because atomization is more complete when using a plasma due to the production of high temperatures. Also the plasma helps reduce the ionization interference effects. In flame absorption, after the sample is nebulized by a flow of gaseous oxidant, mixed with a gaseous fuel and carried into the flame it is then atomized. Then some of the atoms in the gas ionize to form cations and electrons. In flame emission the sample is introduce with argon, carries the sample into the flame. The flame is suppose to atomize the sample, while the flow of gas takes the ions and electrons to be detected.
Okay either this question is just a coincidence or you are in my lab methods II class but ... Imagine your on a football field in the dark and theres a bunch of people with flashlights on, and one person turns theirs off, you might be able to tell where that person was but it would be difficult (absorption). On the other hand if you're on a dark football field and everyone has their flashlights on, if one person turns theirs on you can easily find them (fluorescence). So basically fluorescence is more easily detectable making it more sensitive than absorption.
(metaphor courtesy of Dr. Louise Sowers)
Bald daddies are awesome!
AAS is more sensitive because it excites more atoms from the ground state to excited state compared to AES. It does this by using the specific wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation that a certain element absorb at (the wavelength an element absorbs reflects the energy needed by the electrons in the outer shell of that element to make the appropriate jump to an excited state).
AES on the other hand just heats the metal in a flame and records the characteristic wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation that element emits as the excited electrons move back down from different excitational states to their relaxed (ground) state.
Atomic emission spectroscopy is less sensitive than atomic absorption spectroscopy as the background emission from flames and the sample matrix leads to interference in atomic emission spectroscopy.
It is not a generale rule.
From Secret Diamond: "Diamond fluorescence is the visible wavelengths emitted by diamond when excited by invisible radiation." You can read more about it, below.
Every individual diamond may or may not have a natural fluorescence. This characteristic is both a scientific factor and an emotional -- eye candy -- factor in a diamond. You can read more, below.
flourescence is more sensetive than UV detection
They both measure fluorescence, but a spectrofluorometer usually has adjustable excitation and emission wavelengths via a monochromator; whereas a fluorometer usually measures fixed wavelengths either by filters, monochromators or fixed diodes. Spectrofluorometers are more flexible but fluorometers are much more sensitive, usually 100-1000x more sensitive.
black body absorption phenomenon...guys
Atomic absorption is more sensitive to atomic emission when the excitation potential is greater than 3.5eV.
Atomic absorption spectrometry is more sensitive than atomic emission spectrometry.
No. The computer light is not a natural light. Computer lighting contains certain chemicals that produce light due to a previous absorption of electromagnetic radiation of a different wavelength. This is known as fluorescence (like your fluorescence lamps). However, to ensure a longer lasting light supply, phosphorescent materials are sourced that are more efficient that fluorescence, and the method of cathodoluminescence, involving cathode rays is then applied on materials before being used as part of a monitor screen.
From Secret Diamond: "Diamond fluorescence is the visible wavelengths emitted by diamond when excited by invisible radiation." You can read more about it, below.
Comparative: more sensitive Superlative: most sensitive
Every individual diamond may or may not have a natural fluorescence. This characteristic is both a scientific factor and an emotional -- eye candy -- factor in a diamond. You can read more, below.
advantages: although it requires no digestion, it is very sensitive. it is 10 to 20 times more sensitive than ultraviolet absorption at 289nm and it is simple Disadvantages: the amount of colour varies with different proteins, the colour is not strictly proportional to the concentration
the more ionized the drug is the less absorption
It is an acronym for "Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy. Please refer to the Related Link for more information.
It will limit soil absorption more than increasing it.
flourescence is more sensetive than UV detection
No. They are more sensitive