0
Heat is not an internal property of matter (temperature is!), heat is just a way to change the temperature of an object... it is a flow of energy.
Think of it this way, before you study for a physics test you have a certain level of understanding physics. While you read your text book (or wiki answers) you are studying (understanding is flowing into your head) and afterward you (hopefully) have a greater understanding of physics. Although "studying" went into you, you do not have a certain amount of "study" inside of you before or after, you had an amount of understanding.
In that analogy, "studying" represents heat and "understanding of physics" represents temperature. Heat is just a way to change temperature and therefore you cannot say that matter contains heat!
What else can I help you with?
Heat makes the particles in matter move how?
When heat is added to matter, it increases the energy of the particles within the matter. This increased energy causes the particles to vibrate and move around more rapidly, resulting in an overall increase in the temperature of the material.
What state of matter is a flame considered as?
A flame is not a substance like water or air. Rather, it is the result of heat and light energy so you can't really say what state of matter it is in. Think of it like this; asking what state of matter a flame is in would be like asking what state of matter light or heat are in. They are forms of energy, not substances.
How do you say What is the matter in french?
You would say "Qu'est-ce qui ne va pas?" in French to ask "What is the matter?"
How does burning flames produce heat?
When a material burns, it undergoes a chemical reaction that releases energy in the form of heat and light. The heat produced comes from the energy stored in the chemical bonds of the burning material being released as the bonds break apart. This heat continues to fuel the combustion process, sustaining the flame.
Is fire exothermic?
This is an incomplete question. You mean to say, "Is fire an exothermic reaction?". Even when the question is phrased this way, it still doesn't make sense. Fire is a product of a reaction, meaning energy (in form of heat) is produced. If fire is being produced, then the reaction that caused the release of heat is the exothermic reaction, not the fire.
Why is it incorrect to say that an object contain heat?
It is incorrect to say that an object "contains" heat because heat is not a tangible substance that can be stored within an object. Heat is a form of energy that can be transferred between objects or systems. When we say an object is hot, we actually mean that it has a higher internal energy due to the transfer of heat to it.
Why is it incorrect to say that an object has heat?
It is incorrect to say that an object has heat because heat is not a property that an object possesses; rather, it is the transfer of energy between objects due to a temperature difference. Objects can store thermal energy, but they do not "have" heat in the same way they have mass or volume.
What song contains the lyrics no matter what you say no matter what you've done?
No Matter What - Israel ft Lil Wayne
Why is it wrong to say that heat rises?
It is incorrect to say that "heat rises" because heat does not have mass or volume to physically move in a specific direction. Heat transfer occurs from hot to cold areas due to the movement of thermal energy, known as convection, which leads to the misconception of heat "rising."
How do you say to be incorrect in French?
To be incorrect is avoir faute
We say she has or she have?
you cannot say "he have" this is incorrect, it is " he has"
Does microwave gives out heat?
It would be more accurate to say that microwaves can be converted to heat. A microwave oven is designed speicifically to heat water, or anything that contains water.
What is a material that contains one type of matter?
I think you are a little confused, or I'm not understanding your question. All material is matter. So you can't really say something contains matter. You can't really have "types" of matter either. If you can rephrase your question, I can try and help you better. =D
Why is it wrong to say that an object contains heat?
It isn't wrong to say an object contains heat because the concept of comparing heat to a liquid that can be 'poured' from one object into another creates a perfectly valid model for understanding thermodynamics and performing calculations.For example:Consider a sample of water to represent an object such as a bowl and the level of the liquid in the bowl to represent temperature. The volume of the liquid in the bowl would represent the heat.You would need to pour comparatively more heat into the bowl to cause the same rise in temperature as you would into a narrow vase. A narrow vase would represent an object that has less heat capacity than water, such as most metals.When you allow two substances in contact to come to the same temperature it is the same as pouring heat from one object into the other.At the same temperature, an equal mass of water contains more heat than a piece of metal at the same temperature. The ratio of the change in temperature of an object to that of water gives the specific heat (C) for that substance.
Is it grammatically incorrect to say sister and sister Or just sisters?
It is grammatically incorrect to say sister and sister. You just say sisters.
Why is heat transfer by direct contact of particles of matter to conduction?
That's a definition, not a question per-say.
Is it incorrect grammar to say these ones?
No, it is not incorrect. You could say, "These ones are the best for baking."
