Non polar gases have very low critical temperature. Non polar gases have weak forces of attraction between their particles. They cooled to very low temperature.
Polar gases have high value of critical temperature. The inter molecular forces are very strong . So polar gases have better tendency to be converted into liquid.
Polar molecules have stronger intermolecular forces than non polar molecules and thus the molecules of a polar compound find themselves to be more attracted to eachother than their non polar counterparts. Because the polar gas molecules are more attracted to eachother than the non polar ones, it takes more energy to break the attraction and allow the gas molecules to move freely in a gas state. The more energy it takes to bring a liquid to a boil, the more likely the compound in question will be in liquid state at any given temperature.
Certain non-polar molecules form a liquid and not a gas at an ambient temperature because the bigger the molecules, the heavier they are, the less easily they vaporize.
It has about the same bi-polar structure as water and able to hydrogen bonds with other NH3 molecules.
Since ammonia molecules exhibit hydrogen bonding, these attractions allow ammonia gas to liquefy much more easily than other gases of comparable molecular mass.
Neon and argon are two other gases that are denser than helium and do not react easily with other elements.
The molecules that make up gases are spread farther apart than the molecules that make up liquids, and gas molecules are moving more rapidly. Individual gas molecules have less of an attraction between them than the the molecules making up liquids. That combined with their more rapid movement causes them to be able to diffuse more easily than liquids. Both being fluids, gases are more thinly distrbuted than liquids, which allows them to be diffused more easily. Think of fluids as a large party of people, all holding hands, and you could think of gases as a large party of people equipped with jetpacks. You turn on a very powerful fan. The party of jetpacks will be more easily affected since they're not supported by a link to one another; the party of hand-holders might still be affected, but has a much stronger bond and will not disperse as easily.
Cis fats would have a higher melting point due to tighter packing between molecules, as the chains would be unbent. Trans fats would have kinks in the fatty acid chain and this would hinder molecular packing, thus making it looser and would subsequently liquefy more easilyTrans fats are non polar while Cis fats are polar. Cis fats have strong inter molecular attractions. So melting point of cis fats are higher than trans fats.
It has about the same bi-polar structure as water and able to hydrogen bonds with other NH3 molecules.
Since ammonia molecules exhibit hydrogen bonding, these attractions allow ammonia gas to liquefy much more easily than other gases of comparable molecular mass.
Yes, a polar bear could quite easily overpower a condor.
how am i suposed to know
Light gases; Gases that are light weight will more easily reach escape velocity than heavier gases.
easily liquifiable gases like Cl2, NH3,SO2,HCl are readily adsorbed because the critical temp of these gases are more. so it is easily liquified and adsorbed more readily.[critical temp is the minimum temp above which a gas cannot be liquified]easily liq. gases possess greater vanderwaals forces ,so they are adsorbed readily.these are the 2 reasons why these gases are readily adsorbed than permanent gases like H2, O2.N2 . etc
Neon and argon are two other gases that are denser than helium and do not react easily with other elements.
Because gases can be compressed more easily than liquids. This is because the particles in gases are more far apart than the particles are in liquids so have more room between them to be compressed together(:
well the mighty lion is known as the king of the jungle and tends to eat human flesh though its the same for the polar bear.A lion can be tamed easily unlike a polar bear which takes expert hands.There are more cases of deaths by polar bears in a controlled facility than of lions.wild lions are of coarse more ferocious than wild polar bears and have taken more lives.So I would say there equal.
The molecules that make up gases are spread farther apart than the molecules that make up liquids, and gas molecules are moving more rapidly. Individual gas molecules have less of an attraction between them than the the molecules making up liquids. That combined with their more rapid movement causes them to be able to diffuse more easily than liquids. Both being fluids, gases are more thinly distrbuted than liquids, which allows them to be diffused more easily. Think of fluids as a large party of people, all holding hands, and you could think of gases as a large party of people equipped with jetpacks. You turn on a very powerful fan. The party of jetpacks will be more easily affected since they're not supported by a link to one another; the party of hand-holders might still be affected, but has a much stronger bond and will not disperse as easily.
Cis fats would have a higher melting point due to tighter packing between molecules, as the chains would be unbent. Trans fats would have kinks in the fatty acid chain and this would hinder molecular packing, thus making it looser and would subsequently liquefy more easilyTrans fats are non polar while Cis fats are polar. Cis fats have strong inter molecular attractions. So melting point of cis fats are higher than trans fats.
CuSO4 is ionic and water is polar. The types of bonding allow water to dissolve the salt much more easily than an organic solvent (e.g. alcohol, hexane) could.