The ideas of Democritus (and Leukippus) were intuitive, not experimental; his ideas were too advanced to 2500 years ago
Democritus studied the atomic nature of matter and proposed the concept of atoms as the building blocks of all things. He believed that everything in the universe, including human beings, is made up of these indivisible particles called atoms.
no
Electronic noses are scientific instruments that have the ability to detect and recognize odors, mimicking the human sense of smell. They are commonly used in various industries such as food, beverage, and environmental monitoring.
No, cordial is a type of sweet, fruit-flavored drink that is diluted with water before consumption. It is not a solution in the scientific sense.
Yes, petroleum oil is considered organic in the scientific sense, as it is derived from organic matter, such as ancient marine organisms. However, in everyday language, the term "organic" is usually associated with products made without synthetic chemicals, which petroleum oil is not.
Democritus studied the atomic nature of matter and proposed the concept of atoms as the building blocks of all things. He believed that everything in the universe, including human beings, is made up of these indivisible particles called atoms.
Good science goes through peer review, both in a formal sense when research is published in journals and in a less formal sense when ideas begin to spread and conclusions can be examined and reproduced.
Why is any car useful? Your question makes no sense.
they get their sense of ideas from their Mexican neighbors
Freud's theories are considered more as psychoanalytical than strictly scientific. While some aspects of his work can be tested and validated, much of his ideas and interpretations are not easily measurable or replicable in a scientific sense. Freud's theories have had a significant impact on psychology and continue to be influential in the field.
they had new ideas
The advantages of the scientific method... the scientific method is very useful when you have a problem that you can't figure out using your common sense. Here is an example( this is off of the worksheet I am working on) Ralph's isn't making enough free shots. His coach says he is holding his hands incorrectly. This question is an example of how the experimental part of the scientfic method is useful. But you would need to go through the other parts of the scientific method to get an accurate answer.
The two major advantages of the scientific approach over the common sense approach are that it relies on empirical evidence and systematic procedures to test ideas, leading to more reliable and valid results. Additionally, the scientific approach allows for replication of studies by other researchers, increasing the credibility of the findings.
image dream sense Ideas
its night vision
Marcus Cicero did not have a concept of the atom as we understand it today. In his writings, he discussed principles of natural philosophy and the structure of matter but did not explore atomic theory in the scientific sense. Cicero's ideas were more aligned with Stoic philosophy, focusing on ethics, politics, and rhetoric.
Yes, a scientific theory should make sense based on available evidence and be able to explain observations and predict future outcomes. A theory that does not make sense or contradicts established scientific principles would likely be considered invalid.