No, fat particles are too large to diffuse easily through the cell membrane. Oxygen particles, being smaller, can diffuse freely into cells for cellular respiration.
A tire made of particles joined together by ionic bonds would likely disintegrate upon striking pavement. Ionic bonds are not as strong as covalent bonds, so the force of impact would likely break apart the particles, causing the tire to fall apart.
No, copper and oxygen would not form a covalent bond. Instead, they would likely form an ionic bond, where copper would donate electrons to oxygen to create a copper oxide compound.
Oxygen would most likely be reduced when combined with Zn(s) because zinc has a higher tendency to lose electrons and undergo oxidation, while oxygen has a higher tendency to gain electrons and undergo reduction.
neutrons, protons and electrons. _________ The above is incorrect; those are atomic particles. Subatomic particles are what those particles are made of. Quarks and leptons are subatomic particles.
Shared electrons in a water molecule are most likely found in the covalent bonds between the oxygen and hydrogen atoms. In water, the oxygen atom shares electrons with the hydrogen atoms to form two polar covalent bonds.
Yes, oxygen particles would enter a cell through diffusion more readily than fat particles due to their smaller size and higher solubility in the cell membrane. Fat particles are larger and less likely to pass through the cell membrane via simple diffusion.
Particles in the air contain oxygen, which enable us to breathe.
The term "oxygen particles" is not well defined, since it might refer to either oxygen atoms or oxygen molecules. Chemists would never describe oxygen in terms of particles, they would be specific. Ozone is the O3 molecule, containing 3 oxygen atoms. If you had 9 oxygen atoms you could make three ozone molecules. But if you had 9 oxygen molecules, you could make 6 ozone molecules, since the oxygen molecule is O2 and contains two oxygen atoms.
There is no item on the list of choices that you posted with your question that would be likely to do that.
most likely but my question is why would you do that??
The would be something that would likely disturb or annoy someone if you brought it up.
The particles would stay on the side of the bank and be known as a runoff.
The particles would stay on the side of the bank and be known as a runoff.
The interplanetary, interstellar, and even intergalactic word for oxygen would still be "oxygen".
The would be something that would likely disturb or annoy someone if you brought it up.
Possible, but not likely.
Since oxygen is an inorganic substance, most likely an inorganic chemist would describe the chemical properties of oxygen.