An aquifer is natrually made and a aqueduct is man made channel of pipes
wiki user your wrong a aquifer is not alike to an aqueduct k
i know
Water
No
Help?
They were built by the Romans. So in the roman time frame.
An aqueduct was a water pipe and the Romans used ceramic for the pipes. The ceramic kilns of the tenth legion have been found in present day Israel along with their aqueduct building equipment. Do not be mislead by the external supports of the water pipe. They were at times arches in more than one tier or layer, and they were generally made of stone and concrete. However, they were only supports for the water pipe, no matter how striking they may appear. Remember too, that most Roman aqueducts were underground and they were constructed of ceramic piping.
They are only alike in that both refer to water:An aqueduct is a passageway for water to flow from one area, usually a water supply site, to another area where the water is used.An aquifer is a natural underground supply of water.
An aquifer is natrually made and a aqueduct is man made channel of pipes
Groundwater and aquifers can both be tapped by wells.
Water is transported by gravity from one location to another.
The answer depends on what they are meant to be alike and different from!
how are fifteen and flatter alike and different
i think alike
No, They are not alike as they have different size, features. There might be a similarity but in my view they arent alike. There food is different, there way of living is also different so in my opinion they are not alike.
Fractions are alike if they have the same denominators; otherwise they are different.
Aquifers are found underground.
Aquifers lose their porosity and thus making it not aquifers anymore.
they are alike because they are different columns of digits and they are different because they have different. ddf