Most for normally issued stamps are going to be a couple of dollars to purchase.
Yes, an address will affect the value. On older stamps (pre-1940's) it will not make much of a difference.
That is Scott number US 2853. It has a value of about $2 with cachet and no address.
Not really. It might be of interest to a collector, but without the cancellation, it isn't worth anything other than the value of a used stamp.
First Day Covers without any address are preferred by many collectors. As long as the handwriting is relatively neat, how the address is affixed has little affect on value.
Scott US#1270If it is a first day of issue, it should have a cancellation. A First Day Cover is likely to be worth about a dollar. Without the cancellation it is worth the same as a used stamp, about 15 cents.
(frame no * page size) + offset value = physical add where frame value is the value present in the corresponding page number offset value is the last n bits of the logical address page no is the first m-n bits of logical address 2^m is the logical address 2^n is the page size
That would be US Scott Number 2417. A First Day Cover has a catalog value of $4.
In perfect condition, it is worth 25 cents.
That would be Scott number US 2132. It has a catalog value of 20 cents used and 25 cents mint. The first day cover value is shown as $1.25.
The value of a 1936 copy of "Gone With the Wind" without a cover typically ranges from $10 to $50, depending on the book's condition, any unique attributes (like signatures or inscriptions), and the demand among collectors. Without the dust jacket, the book's value is significantly diminished. For a more precise appraisal, checking with rare book dealers or auction sites can provide current market insights.
FDCs on a commercially produced First Day Covers of standard commemoratives like this are typically worth a dollar or two. The popularity of the Olympics may get you a bit more for it. A specialized catalog will list the value of a cachet or un-cacheted cover.
The first number is an IP address, not a numeric value. Question is bad.