In general, self-defense laws apply to situations where an individual is facing imminent harm or threat. However, when it comes to police misconduct, the application of self-defense can be complex. If a police officer is using excessive force, a person may have grounds to claim self-defense, but the legal outcome will depend on the specifics of the situation, including the perceived threat and the actions taken by both the individual and the officer. It is crucial to seek legal counsel to navigate these circumstances appropriately.
Punishment for police misconduct are not the same for the punishment a citizen would receive in the same scenarios. Most police misconduct is often deemed justifiable as in self defense. Officers are put on paid leave or desk duties. Few have been punished with termination and or imprisonment.
In general, it is legally permissible to use self-defense against a police officer in a threatening situation if the force used is reasonable and necessary to protect oneself from harm. However, the specific circumstances of each situation can impact the legality of self-defense against a police officer. It is important to understand the laws and regulations in your jurisdiction regarding self-defense and interactions with law enforcement.
Go for the baton.
yes
No, police officers cannot decide self-defense. Their report of the incident may reflect what they learned or witnessed at the time of the offense but their only job is to enforce the law impartially. It is the Judge or a jury of peers who decides whether self-defense was legally warranted and/or used.Added: HOWEVER - if the question is asking if a police officer may decide to use force in their own self-defense, THAT is a question that only they can decide. Their actions in their own defense (if alleged to be inappropriate), will be the subject of an inquiry into the circumstances that prevailed at the time they made the decision.
Yes, a person can be charged with manslaughter even if they claim self-defense, depending on the circumstances and evidence presented in the case.
Robert K. Koga has written: 'Controlling force' -- subject(s): Hand-to-hand fighting, Arrest (Police methods), Self-defense 'The Koga method' -- subject(s): Arrest (Police methods), Self-defense
Police would consider it self defense so basically nothing would happen to you he /she was atacking you or you'd go to jail :)
Self Defense
If you are fighting in public, like fighting over a girl at a bar, the police may arrest you for assault or public fighting, or disturbing the peace. If someone is seriously hurt, they may arrest the person who inflicted the injuries, unless it can be proven that it was self-defense. You cannot claim self-defense if you both agree to fight and the other guy (or gal) gets badly hurt or killed. Self-defense basically means that you never wanted to fight, that you were attacked and you had to defend yourself against further injury or risk of death. If you flee the scene of a fight, and the police want to arrest you, they will obtain positive identification of you from witnesses and issue a warrant for your arrest.
Self defense is a legal concept. It is an excuse in some instances. The rather vague measurement is if a reasonable person in that situation would have felt threatened. If the jury agrees that a reasonable person would have felt in danger, they can rule self defense.
Self defence is defending yourself in any way. It could be physically, emotionally....and much more. If you are looking at self defence internationally, then it is the actions taken by a person to prevent another person from causing harm to one's self, one's property or one's home. self defense is what u use when someone is either in a fight or someone is trying to either hurt or kill u. it is best to know self defense so you can self defend your self :-)!