Tags Nuclear Weapons Bombs and Explosive Materials

Animals & Plants Arts & Entertainment Auto Beauty & Health Books and Literature Business Electronics Engineering & Technology Food & Drink History Hobbies Jobs & Education Law & Government Math People & Society Science Social Studies Sports Travel & Places

0

Subjects>Sports>Combat Sports

What is conventional vs nuclear weapons?

Anonymous

∙ 12y ago

Updated: 9/23/2023

Conventional explosives get their energy entirely from chemistry; the outer shell of electrons.

Nuclear explosives get their energy from the nucleus. There is lots more energy there.

Wiki User

∙ 12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

Taiga

Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!

Chat with Taiga

Ezra

Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.

Chat with Ezra

Lao

The path is yours to walk; I am only here to hold up a mirror.

Chat with Lao

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts

Q: What is conventional vs nuclear weapons?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

imp

Trending Questions

Matt hard dated any WWE divas? What is rey mysterios wife name? What are the 12 balocking techniques of arnis? Who would win jaden or yusei? What is a headscissor? Have you heard of the boxer Dusty Miller? Why does WWE superstar Christian have the same theme song? Who is Greg Fears? Did hulk hogan ever beat Andre the giant? Who sang Eric bischoff's theme? Which wrestlers are left handed? How many kids does John Cena have and how old are they? Do you break your nose in boxing? WHO has won the most elimination chambers? What country created boxing? Who do you think is the hottest wrestler on smackdown? Is WWE John Cena Albanian? How Did Giant Gonzalez die? Is maryse french? In the event of a skyjacking you should immediately attempt to subdue the skyjackers. (Antiterrorism Scenario Training?

Related Questions

Nuclear weapons not in Vietnam war?

No, Vietnam was LIMITED to conventional weapons only. A limited war.

What was Kennedy's plan for America called?

either a build up of nuclear weapons, or a buildup in conventional weapons

Why did Eisenhower favor the development of nuclear weapons such as the hydrogen bomb?

He believed that developing nuclear weapons instead of preparing for conventional war was more cost-efficient.

Are there any differences between conventional weapons and non conventional weapons?

Conventional means accepted standards. Conventional weapons are normal weapons that most nations possess; warships, airplanes, artillery, tanks, Machineguns, etc. Un-Conventional Weapons are weapons that most nations do NOT possess. Nuclear Weapons would be un-conventional weapons. An un-heard of primitive weapon might be considered an un-conventional weapon. The term can also be applied to warfare itself: Un-Conventional Warfare might be guerrilla warfare; Conventional warfare would be traditional Armies fighting against another Army.

How dangerous nuclear weapon are?

About as dangerous as conventional weapons of the same yield, plus the radiation effects.

What was Eisenhower's attitude about military power?

the conventional military is less important than nuclear weapons

What was Ronald Reagan's weapons strategy?

a conventional and nuclear military buildup that the Soviets could not afford

How many more times can a nuclear explosions be more powerful than the largest conventional weapon?

theoretically the yield of nuclear weapons is unlimited.

What was the nature of warfare in Vietnam?

The war escalated from a guerrilla war into a conventional war (minus nuclear weapons).

How was the Vietnam fought?

Using all conventional (non-nuclear) weapons to search out and destroy enemy forces.

What describes Eisenhower's attitude about military power?

the conventional military is less important than nuclear weapons

How much worse if at all is a nuclear weapon then a massive number of conventional weapons?

It depends upon what you mean by "conventional" weapons. However, nuclear weapons are far more devastating than conventional weapons because of their inherent atomic components; further are spread over a larger "target" area, thus wreak more havoc and destruction, as in "fall-out" (the aftermath). Just study your history and see what devastation our atomic bomb wroght upon Japan. Conventional? Probably limited in (their) scope of damage.

Still have questions?

imp

Resources

Top Categories

Product

Company

Copyright ©2025 Infospace Holdings LLC, A System1 Company. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Answers.