0
Yes, Computers cannot distinguish or react differently to two persons who are morally opposite (one good other bad). They have moral neutrality.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the feathers of computers?
Computers, at least no mainstream computers, do not have feathers.
Does Logitech make computers?
No, they only make peripherals for computers not computers themselves.
Do computers have arms?
No, computers don't have arms
Did old computers have sound?
no That is for early computers
What you love in computers?
I like computers because you can find answers,play games on them and type on the computers.
What words describe someone whos not kind but not evil either?
disinterested third party, non-interventionist, do-nothing, morally ambivalent, spectator, neutral --- morally ambivalent
Can you make a sentence with the word neutral?
It is morally impossible to remain neutral in this conflict. Certainly. "During the Second World War, most people accept that Switzerland was neutral, even though they helped to fund the Nazi campaign." I'll do a second one, just so you catch the drift. "The car was stuck in neutral gear, and began rolling down the hill." Neutral: Verb. To do very little, or nothing.
Morally acceptable legal separation?
Any legal separation is morally acceptable.Any legal separation is morally acceptable.Any legal separation is morally acceptable.Any legal separation is morally acceptable.
What is a sentence with morally?
is it morally wrong to do so? I can not kill my morals.
Is test tube cloning right or wrong?
In many respects it is morally neutral. From one point of view, it is simply the creation of another life or the imitation of, something that happens on a regular basis naturally. In fact, the act of procreation itself is morally neutral. Imitation of a natural phenomena is hardly unethical either, else many buildings (dams) and technologies (web [internet]) would be morally wrong. Many religions find the concept abhorrent due to the idea that cloning is encroaching upon the territory of their deity. Cloning itself is a tool, a process and as such has no moral leaning. It can be 'right' or 'wrong'.
What is amorousness?
"Amor" is the Portuguese, Spanish, and French word for "love"
Is a UFO evil?
It's possible. They are unidentified so it's impossible to say their moral leanings. IF they are inanimate objects they would be morally neutral. If they were animate they ocould be good, evil, both, or neither.
How will you answer the The Euthyphro Dilemma?
"Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?"
What is the meaning of morally unrestrained?
The literal meaning of morally unrestrained usually refers to something (usually a person or intelligent being who is capable of moral reasoning) who is not bound to any standards or personal laws of moral adequacy and therefore does not consider any act of theirs good or evil, simply a neutral act, regardless of the common or true definition of it.
Is weak affirmative action morally defensible?
No affirmative action is morally defensible.
What is the significance of Euthyphro's dilemma?
The Euthyphro dilemma. "Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?"
Is there anything morally wrong and why is it wrong?
yes, there is. Some would argue that the taking of life (killing someone) is morally wrong. A counter-argument might be if in self-defence, the taking of a life might be morally right, since it preserves another's life. However, this does not contradict the point that the taking of a life is still morally wrong. Indeed, the taking of a life can be both morally right and morally wrong.
