0
How can you prove that the set of all languages that are not recursively enumerable is not countable?
One way to prove that the set of all languages that are not recursively enumerable is not countable is by using a diagonalization argument. This involves assuming that the set is countable and then constructing a language that is not in the set, leading to a contradiction. This contradiction shows that the set of all languages that are not recursively enumerable is uncountable.
What else can I help you with?
How can you prove that the complement of a regular language is regular?
The complement of a regular language is regular because regular languages are closed under complementation. This means that if a language is regular, its complement is also regular.
How can you prove that the reverse of a regular language is regular?
The reverse of a regular language is regular because for every string in the original language, there exists a corresponding string in the reversed language that is also regular. This is because regular languages are closed under the operation of reversal, meaning that if a language is regular, its reverse will also be regular.
Is it possible to prove that the clique problem is NP-complete?
Yes, it is possible to prove that the clique problem is NP-complete.
Is it possible to prove that a software component and even an entire program is correct?
No. You can only state correctness to a degree of certainty. That degree might be very high, particularly for a very short routine, but no one can prove correctness to 100%.
Which of these is not a good tip to follow when making Internet purchases?
Use your credit card to prove your identity.
Prove that countable space is countable?
prove that every metric space is hausdorff and first countable
Prove that a finite cartesian product of countable sets is countable?
here is the proof: http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/ProductOfAFiniteNumberOfCountableSetsIsCountable.html
How prove that the set of irrational numbers are uncountable?
Proof By Contradiction:Claim: R\Q = Set of irrationals is countable.Then R = Q union (R\Q)Since Q is countable, and R\Q is countable (by claim), R is countable because the union of countable sets is countable.But this is a contradiction since R is uncountable (Cantor's Diagonal Argument).Thus, R\Q is uncountable.
How do you prove sanskrit as the mother of all languages?
It isn't possible to prove because Sanskrit isn't the mother of all languages; Sanskrit is descended from Proto-Indian-Iranian, However, Sanskrit is one of the oldest languages that is still in use.
How can you prove that the complement of a regular language is regular?
The complement of a regular language is regular because regular languages are closed under complementation. This means that if a language is regular, its complement is also regular.
If Native Americans came from Asia are there any Asian words found in Native American languages?
I don't know if there can be found any words (because I can't find any dictionary on the Internet of a Siberian language or a Native-American one), that are the same. But there are still some languages in Siberia (Russia), that are part of the Eskimo-Aleut language family, an North-American language family, this could prove that the Eskimo-Aleut languages (and other languages in America) have there origins in Asia.
What did Avogadro's number prove?
no prove....
How does an only child prove there are no other siblings?
Prove to whom? You can't "prove" a negative.
Can you prove there are angels in heaven?
I can prove there are angels on earth.. trust in god and he will prove it to you too.
Q.If a language is decidable and Turing recognizable then prove that it is also co Turing?
Turing Decidable Languages are both Turing Rec and Turing Co-Recognizable. If a Language is Not Turing Decidable, either it, or it's complement, must be not Recognizable.
Do you need language or languages?
There is little doubt that learning a foreign language will expand your views of the world, and will create associations that prove helpful. There are quite valid ways of viewing a subject. A realistic interpretation of "fire escape" is in French "Flee the fire". Perhaps a better command. And, other styles of thinking can be considered to have their own languages. Obvious examples are Mathematics, and Music.
When was Prove It created?
Prove It was created in 1977.
