The graphic rating scale method of performance management is a quantitative evaluation tool used to assess an employee's performance across various dimensions, such as quality of work, communication skills, and teamwork. Evaluators typically use a scale (often ranging from 1 to 5 or 1 to 10) to rate each dimension, providing a clear and standardized measure of performance. This method is straightforward and easy to administer, but it can sometimes lack depth and may not capture the nuances of an employee's performance. Additionally, it may be subject to biases if evaluators do not apply the scale consistently.
The Graphic Rating Scale is the simplest and most popular method for performance appraisal
graphic rating scales, ranking methods, group method, assessment centres...
It is part of rating in performance management. RATING (A+)
The Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) is a performance appraisal method that combines elements of both graphic rating scales and critical incident methods. It evaluates employee performance by using specific behavior examples as anchors to rate performance levels, providing specific and observable criteria for assessing performance. This method helps reduce rating errors and provides a more objective assessment compared to traditional rating scales.
Performance appraisal means evaluating an employee's current or past Performance relative to the person's performance standards. Appraisal involves: (i) Setting work standards (ii) Assessing the employee's actual performance relative to these standards (iii) Providing feedback to the employees with the aim of motivating that person to eliminate deficiencies or to continue to perform above par. Managers usually conduct the appraisal using a predetermined and formal method. Various methods of appraisal include:- Graphic rating scale method. Alternate ranking method Paired comparison method Forced distribution method Critical incident method Narrative forms Behaviorally anchored rating scales Management by objective (MBO) 360 degree feedback.
The performance evaluation rating method being described is known as the categorical rating method or rating scale method. In this approach, employees are assessed based on specific criteria and assigned scores that correspond to preselected categories, such as "exceeds expectations," "meets expectations," or "needs improvement." This method allows for a structured and standardized evaluation process, making it easier to compare performance across employees.
Planning , monitoring, developing, rating, and rewarding
Planning , monitoring, developing, rating, and rewarding
Traditional methodsAlpha/numberical ratings Forced choice rating (rating scales) Forced distribution (bell-curved) Modern methods Democratisation (360o feedback)
BARS (Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale) and the Graphic Rating Scale are both performance evaluation tools, but they differ in their approach. BARS incorporates specific behavioral examples to anchor each rating point, providing clear criteria for evaluation and enhancing objectivity. In contrast, the Graphic Rating Scale uses a continuum (e.g., 1 to 5) without specific behavioral anchors, which can lead to more subjective interpretations. Thus, BARS tends to offer more precise feedback, while the Graphic Rating Scale is simpler and quicker to administer.
Charles M. Cadwell has written: 'Evaluating Performance' 'Powerful performance appraisals' -- subject(s): Employees, Personnel management, Rating of 'New employee orientation' -- subject(s): Handbooks, manuals, Employee orientation, Supervisors 'The human-touch performance appraisal' -- subject(s): Employees, Rating of, Personnel management
appraisal methods include (1) ranking of all employees in a group; (2) using rating scales to define above-average, average, and below-average performance; (3) recording favorable and unfavorable performance