Which of the following is an example of unstructured system
unstructured means any random pieces of information
discuss the difference between structured and unstructured problems.
A program in unstructured language consists of sequence of commands, or statements, usually one in each line. these lines may have labels. labels helps to jump any line in the program. unstructured
Good q
a peom that is not structured
nghghgh
Structured files contain records, unstructured files are byte-streams. (Modern OS's (Windows, UNIX) have only unstructured files.)
A structured questionnaire has pre-set questions with fixed response options, while an unstructured questionnaire allows for open-ended responses. Structured questionnaires are ideal for quantitative research to collect standardized data, while unstructured questionnaires are more commonly used in qualitative research to gather in-depth insights. Structured questionnaires are easier to analyze and compare, while unstructured questionnaires offer more flexibility and depth in responses.
ghant
I can perform in either environment, but enjoy working unstructured more. I am a creative individual who needs finding new and better ways of doing things and solving problems; this is best achieved where experimentation and or original thinking is allowed and most often that is the unstructured environment.
Adhoc or unstructured testing stands as a unique approach within the realm of software testing. Unlike the systematic methodologies that are predefined and structured, adhoc testing is free from such boundaries. It's much like an unscripted journey through the software, where the tester relies on their intuition, experience, and creativity. The aim? To unearth defects that structured tests might overlook. At its core, adhoc testing is similar to a traveler exploring an unknown city without a map. While structured testing can be likened to a guided tour with a set itinerary, adhoc testing is an uncharted adventure. Such an approach brings forth both advantages and challenges. On one hand, it can unveil unique defects, especially those arising from unpredictable user behaviors. The flexibility it offers to testers is unparalleled. However, on the flip side, the tests are not reproducible since they lack documentation. This means that if a defect is found, reproducing the exact conditions can be challenging. Yet, when viewed in the broader spectrum of software quality assurance, adhoc testing carves its niche. It complements structured testing, ensuring software is seen from both a systematic and a spontaneous lens. In essence, while adhoc testing offers spontaneity and discovery, coupling it with structured testing ensures a holistic evaluation of software.