No
The parallax error happens when you take a picture using your digital camera and the picture does not appear to look the same as it did in the viewfinder. The cameras that may have this error occur are the twin lens reflex cameras and cameras that include viewfinders.
When aligning the crosshairs of a rifle scope with a target, if the shooter's eye is not directly centered behind the scope, a parallax error can occur. This causes the crosshairs to appear off-target even though the rifle is aimed correctly. Adjusting the parallax on the scope can help eliminate this error.
There is no such way to avoid parallax error, you just have to be careful.. :)
Some types of errors in physics include systematic errors, which result from flaws in experimental setup or measurement instruments; random errors, which occur due to fluctuations in experimental conditions or human limitations; and instrumental errors, which arise from inaccuracies or limitations in measurement devices.
while doing experiments the analog readings should be taken very carefully ..the pointer should be in a parallel axis with your eyes so that the reading will not deviate from right one.otherwise error may occur this error is called parallax error. this error can be avoided by placing mirror at bottom of dial to adjust the axis with your eye by seeing in to mirror and the pointer
simply speaking, systematic errors are those you can improve on( so if you have a systematic error, its probably your fault). Random errors are unpredictable and cannot be corrected. A parallax error can be corrected by you and if there is a parallax error, its probably your fault.
control
When a readng is taken from an analog meter, the pinter must be viewed correctly as it is a short distance away from the scale, so if read from one side, an error of several divisions will occur. To avoid this error the meter should be read from a position directly above the pointer. To help avoid this error most meters have a mirror in the scale so that the error may be dicerned more readily.
Most likely during an unkown "command" overflow
deletion or duplication
The question would be the latter "How did this error occur?" The former is the objective form, e.g. "I am trying to discover how this error occurred."