Celerons are designed to be cheaper (and thus slower) than their higher-end counterparts. They do this by removing L2 cache or instruction sets from the processor. Depending on the age of your computer (the Celeron line dates back nearly 12 years), it may also simply be too slow to accomplish the tasks that you want it to do.
Celeron was created in 1998.
Processor is too slow to run a emulator for PS2 games
No. The Celeron is much slower.
D is better as it has dual core function
Intel produces Intel Celeron processors.
In terms of raw performance, an equally priced Turion will outperform a Celeron.
No, unfortunately. Not in today's world of computing. It's a single-core processor running at a slow 2.2 gigahertz. The new Celerons, however, are dual-cores, which makes them twice as efficient, and have higher clock speeds, up to 2.7 gigahertz. The Celeron E3300, E3400, and E3500 all are much better processors than the Celeron 900, and are all available for less than $65.
The Intel Celeron 900 was first released and used in computers in April 1998. There have been various versions of the Celeron for computer and for laptop use.
what was the operating temperature of the cpu for the intel celeron g540
Celeron doesn't refer to any particular processor series. Celerons were cost-reduced versions of their Pentium equivalents. The Celeron in question could be based on a Pentium 2, Pentium 3, Pentium 4, Pentium D, or Core 2 Duo. In which case the answers would be "Pentium 3, Usually Pentium 3, Celeron, Celeron, and Celeron", respectively.
A Celeron processor. Some Celeron processors are somewhat powerful, however Atom processors are slower, intended for basic use in ultra-mobile machines such as netbooks.
The Xeon processor is stronger than the Celeron processor.