The attorney asked several questions of the witnes.
Any one can serve as a witness to a will. The fact that they are an attorney makes no difference.
To introduce a witness in court, the attorney should first state the witness's name and their relationship to the case. The attorney should then ask the witness to take an oath to tell the truth. After that, the attorney can begin questioning the witness to elicit relevant information and testimony.
Yes, an attorney can testify as a witness in a court case, but there are limitations and ethical considerations that may apply.
The attorney who calls the witness conducts a direct examination. The opposing attorney may then conduct a cross examination. The first attorney may then conduct a redirect exam, whereupon the opposing attorney may conduct a recross exam.
Direct examination is when the witness is FIRST questioned in court by an attorney (usually their own lawyer), when he is questioned by the opposing side it is called "cross-examination."
To call a witness to the stand in a court proceeding, the attorney must ask the judge for permission to do so. The attorney will then approach the witness and ask them to take the stand to provide testimony.
NOT a prosecution witness! BUT - if you are a defense witness you should consult with the defendants defense attorney before you do so.
When an attorney questions their own witness during a trial, it is called "direct examination." This process allows the attorney to present the witness's testimony to support their case and establish facts. During direct examination, leading questions are generally not permitted, as the goal is to allow the witness to provide their account in their own words.
Re-word the question please - it doesn't make any sense the way it's written.
No. The attorney-client privilege is limited to confidential communications between the lawyer and his client. The relationship between the lawyer and his expert witness is governed only by contract.
It began on 1970
The attorney wants to find out what the witness knows. He might ask what they saw, what time it happened and other stuff. He needs the information to decide whether the witness is good or whether it would be a waste of time to use the witness. If he called a witness to the stand and the witness didn't have any information, didn't see or hear anything - it would waste time in court.