The attorney wants to find out what the witness knows. He might ask what they saw, what time it happened and other stuff. He needs the information to decide whether the witness is good or whether it would be a waste of time to use the witness. If he called a witness to the stand and the witness didn't have any information, didn't see or hear anything - it would waste time in court.
The attorney asked several questions of the witnes.
When an attorney questions their own witness during a trial, it is called "direct examination." This process allows the attorney to present the witness's testimony to support their case and establish facts. During direct examination, leading questions are generally not permitted, as the goal is to allow the witness to provide their account in their own words.
A grand jury witness can expect to answer questions from the prosecutor and defense attorney. They may also have to answer questions from the judge.
Direct examination is when the witness is FIRST questioned in court by an attorney (usually their own lawyer), when he is questioned by the opposing side it is called "cross-examination."
Re-word the question please - it doesn't make any sense the way it's written.
During a trial, witnesses are typically questioned by the attorneys through a process called direct examination and cross-examination. The attorney who called the witness asks questions first (direct examination), followed by the opposing attorney who asks questions to challenge the witness's testimony (cross-examination). The judge may also allow redirect examination by the first attorney to clarify any points raised during cross-examination. The questions must be relevant to the case and follow the rules of evidence.
A defense attorney may ask questions during cross-examination to challenge the credibility of a witness by questioning their consistency, bias, motives, and ability to perceive or remember events accurately. They may also inquire about any prior inconsistent statements or behavior that could undermine the witness's reliability.
Any one can serve as a witness to a will. The fact that they are an attorney makes no difference.
To introduce a witness in court, the attorney should first state the witness's name and their relationship to the case. The attorney should then ask the witness to take an oath to tell the truth. After that, the attorney can begin questioning the witness to elicit relevant information and testimony.
When a witness is called to the stand in a trial - the replies he gives to the first round of questioning he undergoes is called his direct testimony. When the opposing attorney gets to ask him questions he is said to be cross-examining him. Then, if the cross-examination raised some new questions in the first attorney's mind he might question him a second time - this is known as giving re-direct testimony. Then - if the opposing attorney follows up with more of his own questions he is said to be re-cross-examining.
Yes, an attorney can testify as a witness in a court case, but there are limitations and ethical considerations that may apply.
The attorney who calls the witness conducts a direct examination. The opposing attorney may then conduct a cross examination. The first attorney may then conduct a redirect exam, whereupon the opposing attorney may conduct a recross exam.