0
What questions might a defense attorney ask during cross-examination to challenge the credibility of a witness?
A defense attorney may ask questions during cross-examination to challenge the credibility of a witness by questioning their consistency, bias, motives, and ability to perceive or remember events accurately. They may also inquire about any prior inconsistent statements or behavior that could undermine the witness's reliability.
What else can I help you with?
What happens during cross examination?
The defense tries to create doubt in the minds of the jury.
Can an informant testify if they have convictions for bad checks?
A prior conviction does not prohibit a person from testifying. Certain convictions may be used to challenge the credibility of a witness before the jury. Whether or not a witness is called to testify is the decision of the lead attorney who would call the witness.
What are the procedures for presenting witness questions in court during a trial?
During a trial, witnesses are typically questioned by the attorneys through a process called direct examination and cross-examination. The attorney who called the witness asks questions first (direct examination), followed by the opposing attorney who asks questions to challenge the witness's testimony (cross-examination). The judge may also allow redirect examination by the first attorney to clarify any points raised during cross-examination. The questions must be relevant to the case and follow the rules of evidence.
What does the attorney began to grill the witness?
The attorney asked several questions of the witnes.
When was attorney general Palmer's credibility was permanently harmed?
When his prediction of an attempted communist takeover did not come true.
What does redirect exam testimony mean?
When a witness is called to the stand in a trial - the replies he gives to the first round of questioning he undergoes is called his direct testimony. When the opposing attorney gets to ask him questions he is said to be cross-examining him. Then, if the cross-examination raised some new questions in the first attorney's mind he might question him a second time - this is known as giving re-direct testimony. Then - if the opposing attorney follows up with more of his own questions he is said to be re-cross-examining.
Can we challenge the district attorney?
You need to put more information into your question.
Can an attorney fight for an inmate not to be extradited?
Yes, he could try to challenge it.
Which is more important direct-examination or cross-examination?
Both direct-examination and cross-examination are important in a trial. Direct-examination allows the attorney to present their case and their witness's testimony, while cross-examination gives the opposing attorney the opportunity to challenge the witness's credibility and testimony. They both serve different purposes in the trial process and are equally important.
Why would the attorney General want to call?
The Attorney General may want to call a witness to gather crucial information or testimony related to a legal case or investigation. This could be to strengthen the government’s position, clarify facts, or challenge the credibility of opposing evidence. Additionally, calling a witness could help ensure that justice is served by providing a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand.
What does redirect examination mean?
Redirect examination is when an attorney asks follow-up questions to a witness after the opposing attorney has completed their cross-examination. The purpose is to clarify any points raised during cross-examination and to reinforce the witness's credibility or testimony. It is limited to addressing issues raised during cross-examination and cannot introduce new topics.
What is A challenge in which an attorney has broad discretion in excusing jurors?
It is called a PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE and is exercised during the Voir Dire portion of jury selection.
