The creation of latifundia, large estates typically worked by slaves or tenant farmers, led to the displacement of small farmers who could not compete with the vast agricultural output of these estates. As these smallholders lost their land, they often migrated to cities in search of work and better opportunities. This mass urban migration contributed to the growth of cities but also increased poverty and unemployment, as the urban labor market became saturated. Consequently, the social and economic dynamics shifted, exacerbating the divide between the wealthy landowners and the impoverished urban population.
Creating the large land estates would displace the poor people living there and there only choice was to move to cities to find employment.
Creating the large land estates would displace the poor people living there and there only choice was to move to cities to find employment.
The creation of latifundia, which were large agricultural estates, led to the concentration of land ownership in the hands of a few wealthy individuals. This resulted in the displacement of small farmers and peasants who were unable to compete with the large-scale production and efficiency of latifundia. As a consequence, many poor people migrated to cities in search of new economic opportunities and livelihoods.
cause there stupid
Cause of you people.
There were an increased number of factory jobs in the cities.
yeah cause sobriety has to do with how big your city is.
This is the worng site to look for answers
it does not cause the creation of the ozone.
People found bad conditions in cities and difficulties getting jobs
Not really.
The 'First Cause Argument' is based on the biblical creation story, so it would be false logic and a circular argument then to use the creation story to support the First Cause Argument.For more information on the Bible creation story, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation