I see this and I think that it can only have validity in the same manner that asking, "Who is the most insane patient in the insane asylum?" can have validity.
The least admirable character would be King Arthur. I base this purely subjective opinion on the immortal words of Michael Dukakis, who said, "A fish rots from the head first."
King Arthur surrounded himself with these liars, braggarts, betrayers, cheaters, killers and all around fools. There wasn't some other authority who had responsibility for seeing that such types were not allowed to run about at large.
So he is the head of them all, the one who enabled them all, and the least admirable of them all.
Robinson Crusoe's least admirable character trait was his tendency toward arrogance and stubbornness. He often displayed a lack of humility and a belief in his own superiority, leading him to make rash decisions and overlook the advice of others. This trait contributed to his isolation and conflicts with fellow humans throughout the story.
The most infamous would be Nero. Being admirable is all up to personal opinion.
In the traditional sources; ie Morte d'Arthur & Vulgate Cycle, Uther doesn't have a "ward". At least none are mentioned. In History of the Kings of Britain by Geoffrey of Monmouth, Uther has daughter named Anna and Arthur his son. In later versions, only Arthur is mentioned as Uther's child.
The positive form of "least impressive" is "impressive." While "least impressive" indicates a lack of noteworthy qualities, "impressive" suggests that something has qualities that are striking or admirable.
According to census.gov, Arthur County, Nebraska, has the least population at 356 people 2007.
A protagonist is least likely to be an antagonist, as the antagonist is typically the character who opposes the protagonist and creates conflict in the story.
Jago
A secondary character
At least 3 things that give Japan character is their writing system, transportation, and machinery.
AnswerYes, they were Christians. But in most versions they are not connected with England as at least some of the authors of the Arthurian tales knew that Arthur was supposed to have reigned over Britain before the invading English conquered a large portion of it and named it England.Sir Thomas Malory in his Le Morte d'Arthur is unusual in using the name England a great deal.
Otto
not till at least series 4