In most mythology, legends, and modern interpretations, dragons are much larger and stronger than humans. Dragons may also have the benefit of other powers, such a fire-breathing, hypnotism, flight, etc. Mentally, however, there is some controversy. In most modern works, dragons are as smart as, or even smarter than, humans. However, in most mythology and legends, dragons are little more than beasts, causing destruction, killing people, eating cattle, etc.
No, European Dragons are stronger and larger than Chinese dragons but they are not the best.
Lions are bolder than tigers, but tigers, being lone hunters, have to be more cautious. Tigers are more powerful than lions on average, however.
dragons are more powerful than tigers
No, they just have different fur to adapt with their surroundings, camouflage like.
Tigers are much more powerful. Tigers naturally are bigger and with size comes strengh. Also lions are very lazy animals, while tigers are always on the move. Tigers are also alot faster then lions.
Tigers are probably stronger than puma's when you consider brute strength alone, mostly because they are larger and have much more muscle mass. However, pumas have a more lean smaller size which makes them a lot more agile and "light on their feet".
Although a very powerful cat, jaguars are not as strong as tigers, which are the most powerful of the cat family.
A bomb is more powerful than a bullet its obvious
The Internet would be more powerful than WikiAnswers.
there are more tigers living in captivity than in the wild
No, cheetahs do not eat tigers. Cheetahs primarily hunt and feed on smaller prey such as antelope, gazelles, and hares. Tigers are much larger and more powerful predators that would not be prey for cheetahs.
No the hornet is more powerful