Archaeopteryx had claws on its wings, a long tail, and a toothed beak. These are all considered reptilian traits.
It could be described as the first bird.
A suffix that could be added to "reptilian" is "istic," resulting in "reptilianistic."
well Darwin knew that reptiles could change into birds and an archaeopteryx is basically a reptile with wings
An Archaeopteryx may have been able to fly, but a plesiosaur is a swimming reptile, and it doesn't fly. Archaeopteryx could not fly is was too heavey and its wings were way too short to support flight and as for the plesiosaur as the previous person mentioned it was a swimming reptile
It is the shell
The archaeopteryx was clearly bipedal as it had 2 legs and 2 wings that clearly could not support body weight like the legs. However the wings had claws and could very likely be used to climb trees using all 4 limbs.
They could be described as prime ministers.
Archaeopteryx was likely an omnivore, feeding on a combination of both plant and animal matter. Fossil evidence suggests that it had teeth adapted for eating small prey, but also had claws and a jaw structure that could have facilitated the consumption of plants.
Easy! The best example is an Archaeopteryx. Pterodactyls and Pternadons are others but there is some debate that they actually glided instead of flying.
It will be described as destructive
By the end of the 17th century, Viginia could best be described as a?
actually no dinosaurs ever flew. pterodactyls and the often called dinobird archaeopteryx were ancient flying creatures, but none of them are classified as dinos.