By unit of length and distance and conversion ,we can say that
1 km =1000 m
metres are more precise than km
yes, because if it was in km it would be 5.011km, which has more significant figures
1 kilometer = 1,000 meters 2 kilometers = 2,000 meters 2,002 meters is more than that.
Well, honey, 8 kilometers is the same as 8000 meters. So technically, 8001 meters is more than 8 kilometers by a measly 1 meter. But hey, who's counting?
Liters and meters measure different things; and none is more precise than the other. Both are defined with great precision.
Given that 4987 metres is a more precise unit of measurement than 5 kilometres, you could argue that it would take more skill to walk exactly 4987 metres than it would to cover an approximate measurement of 5 kilometres.
3 kilometers is far more longer than 4 meters. 1 kilometer = 1,000 meters. 3 kilometers would be equal to 3,000 meters.
To do the calculations: 3668 meters = 3.66800 kilometers And 3.67 kilometers = 3670 meters So 3.67 kilometers is greater than 3668 meters 3.67 km > 3668 m
there are 1000 meters in 1 kilometer...
To measure the length of a bridge, you would typically use meters or kilometers, depending on the bridge's size. For longer bridges, kilometers may be more practical, while meters provide a more precise measurement for shorter spans. In some countries, feet or miles might also be used.
A kilometer is one thousand meters. So yes, a kilometer is larger.
3.20m is more precise than 3.2m.
No, it is not.