It depends on the water source, and the contaminants in it. Spring water or RO water is dropped into bottles with 0.2 to 0.4 ppm of ozone. This just keeps the contents "sterile" until the bottle is capped, and the ozone decays back to oxygen.
One community in California gets their drinking water from an underground well located in a buried ancient redwood forest... and ozone cannot treat it economically. The low tens of ppm of ozone were applied, and eventually so much oxygen ended up in the water, the carbon filters would get bound up with all the gas. To say nothing about corrosion in the distribution system from high dissolved oxygen.
Ozone doses of 1 - 3 ppm are ideal (cost and payback), and other treatment methods need to be applied either before or after ozonation (adding ozone to water), to allow this much / little ozone in most surface water sources.
Underground sources commonly only require filtration and/or ion exchange. Ozone is not usually required unless the ions are not fully oxidized, which is why they are found dissolved in water. Examples are iron, arsenic, and manganese. Manganese is a tricky one. Within increasing oxidation it goes from soluble (bad), to insoluble (good, can be adsorbed to something), to soluble again (bad). So ozone doses here have to be carefully applied.
The ozone hole isn't the problem. The means for us to develop the energy used to make ozone to fill the hole is the problem. We put too much waste heat, too much water vapor into the atmosphere, and this depletes ozone.
Ozone could kill fish at a high enough level. However, ozone is commonly used in aquaculture, aquariums, and other applications to keep fish healthy, water clean and clear, and reduce maintenance of tanks. Check out your local zoo, it will certainly have an ozone system used for the aquariums and aquatic life. This is how they keep the water so clear and blue. Ozone levels must be controlled very closely as too much ozone can harm fish, just like it can harm us if there is too much ozone in the air.
The ozone layer is not "imbalanced". There is a region of low ozone concentration (the "ozone hole") that forms at the pole that has little-to-no UV from the Sun to reform ozone. The concentration at any point in the ozone layer is a function of how much UV is arrving of a wavelength of 215nm or shorter, how much scavengers / catalysts are present (including water vapor), and the local temperature (ozone also decays spontaneously without any other molecule present with time).
2 glasses of water is required to make one page.
No, we cannot make an ozone layer above it, below it, and we can't fill it in. We just have to stop dumping things into the atmosphere.There is too much energy above the ozone layer to let ozone survive.There is too much water vapor below the ozone layer to let ozone survive.We'd burn up all our fossil fuels trying to get ozone "up there", which would destroy more ozone than we ever made.
Much of the world does not have access to uncontamined freshwater. If contaminated water is rendered safe or if salt-water could be efficiently purified, this problem would soon be relieved.
Depletion is depletion, everywhere. The size and duration of the ozone hole is a symptom of both how much water surface is located below it, and contaminants that require visible light to be photoactivated into ozone destruction. Don't be distracted by the size of the ozone hole.
23 percent of incoming solar energy is usually absorbed by the ozone. Temperature, not how much
A measure of how much more pure your protein is after a purification step in comparison to the crude. You can calculate this by dividing the purified steps specific activity by the crude steps specific activity.
50 litres.
12L
They do harm the ozone. But the amount is very less.