Loyalists opposed the Boston Tea Party because they viewed it as an act of rebellion and lawlessness against British authority. They believed that the colonists should respect British laws and taxes, seeing the protest as a threat to order and stability. Additionally, loyalists often had economic ties to Britain and saw the destruction of tea as damaging to their interests, viewing the act as an unwarranted attack on British trade and governance.
by makes their own laws
Yes, They didnt like the Boston tea Party and Later Fought with the Republican party When they fromed in 1810 and Traded with South America for Tobacco
yea
Most of the Boston Tea Party participants brought a disguise to make them look like Indians.
i like chicken
no i like you
like indians
They didnt like them because they teased them about their red jackets saying that they looked like lobsters.
Paul Revere and Samuel Adams lead the Boston tea party. They also were dressed up like mohawk Indians.
They dressed up like Indians.
It is a matter of opinion whether a loyalist is better than a patriot. A loyalist is loyal to the government. A patriot is loyal to the nation. If the government is a good one, a loyalist is a patriot. If the governent is not so good, a loyalist supports it anyhow, and disagrees with a patriot who would wish the replace the government for the good of the nation. why i think patriota are better is because if you think about it patriots are better because loayalist depend on there king to give them everything and we make our own decisions but what if the king made a choice for a loyalist and they didnt like it they cant controll that but we can we are in charge of ourselfs. the end
Yes, John Connolly is a loyalist.