Yes, and no. You could keep breaking, and breaking an ice cube, but eventually it would melt.
Solid rocks break into smaller pieces because weathering could take bits and pieces of the rock. Then erosion carries the rock to some were else. Finally deposition will drop the rock in that place were the erosion brought it.
[object Object]
The forces creating mountains either continue pushing them upward or stop. Erosion is continually trying to make them shorter. Therefore, mountains could get bigger, or mountains could get smaller. It depends on which force acting upon them is stronger.
If you're talking about a natural process, I think it's decomposition. Breaking down exposed rock into smaller fragments could also be done by physical crushing.
Adding sugar to cold water is the absolute slowest way to dissolve the sugar. If you're wanting to dissolve sugar at a very fast rate, add some sugar crystals in a hot beverage.
You should try it. But it might take a while to break it down to one molecule, which is as small as it could be while still being ice (any smaller and you're breaking the water down into hydrogen and oxygen, and you'd no longer have ice. If you kept going after that....well, don't even get me started on quarks and the like!).
Best practices dictate that if you want any control whatsoever over the size and geometry of the smaller pieces, that you take your diamond to a diamond cutter and pay to have it 'broken' into smaller pieces. If you don't care about the smaller pieces, or the value of the diamond, you could hit the diamond with a hammer and see what happens.
Ice cubes are not always true cubes to begin with but we call them that anyway. If you were to break one it would just be smaller pieces of ice which depending on your perception could still be called cubes.
Solid rocks break into smaller pieces because weathering could take bits and pieces of the rock. Then erosion carries the rock to some were else. Finally deposition will drop the rock in that place were the erosion brought it.
Democritus' response was... There is a limit, if it is to remain in its original form. He concluded that matter can only be divided to its smallest particle... an atom, to retain it's physical characteristic.
97
There are a couple thing you could do: * add a heat source (ie. hair dryer or stove) * increase the surface area by breaking it into smaller pieces * add salt for the same reasons they add salt to ice-y roads in the winter
Atom comes from atomic, meaning 'indivisible'. It was previously believed that an atom could not be divided into smaller pieces.
Wind is an agent of weathering and erosion. Weathering is the breaking of rock into smaller particles. Wind moves small rock particles against other rock surfaces, weathering them. Wind will also drive water deeper into fissures, which could then freeze, causing further weathering. Wind can also cause greater wave action on shorelines, increasing weathering.
This is FALSE ! Because you only broke it in pieces and tearing or breaking into pieces is a PHYSICAL CHANGE not a chemical change. ---------------------------- I also consider that breaking graphite is only a physical change. - - - - --------------------- It's true, you break chemical bonds when you break pieces of graphite. Graphite is a macromolecule: it is found in sheets, and within the sheets each carbon atom is bonded to four other carbon atoms. The only way you could possibly get it apart is to break the bonds between atoms.
When you break up a solid into smaller pieces it dissolves faster when you have big pieces of the solid you have to wait for the substance that is dissolving it ti be picked up by the object that is being dissolved but when the pieces are smaller it dissolves faster because their smaller and the substance dissolving the object get picked up much faster
[object Object]