It's possible. The idea that a passing bird (satellite) "hammers" atmospheric gases accelerating and ionizing them makes sense. And if they were ionized, they will be subject to deflection in the magnetic field of the earth, although ions of oxygen and nitrogen that lack one or two electrons would be deflected less by the magnetic field than would a hydrogen ion that comes in as part of the solar wind, because of the mass difference of the ions. Also, ions of opposite charge would move in opposite directions. But kicking them into space? Possible. But perhaps not very likely if they are ionized. They'll "circle" the event. They'll move out and be deflected sideways. They'll move sideways and be deflected down. They'll move down, and be deflected to the other side. They can't get "up and away" as ions. Ions could move "along" the magnetic lines of force and head to the poles, as you may have suspected. That's because a magnetic field cannot deflect a charged particle moving in the same direction as the magnetic field lines. Atoms might be able to escape, though. Some of the ions that are deflected by the magnetic field may impact other atoms or molecules in the atmosphere, thereby transferring some of their momentum to them. These atoms may or may not be ionized by these collisions. If they are not ionized, but are accelerated to escape velocities, then we can assume that they may escape from the gravitational hold of the earth.
Space pollution is the collection of defunct objects in the space around Earth. It includes everything that can be considered debris, from old satellites, spent rocket stages and rock fragments from erosion and collision.
No, cars generally produce more pollution than houses. Cars emit carbon dioxide and various pollutants from their exhaust, while houses mainly contribute to pollution through energy consumption, which can come from sources like natural gas or coal. However, the overall pollution levels from houses can vary depending on factors like energy efficiency and renewable energy usage.
Space pollution is mainly composed of defunct spacecraft, spent rocket stages, and fragments from collisions and explosions in orbit. Other sources include abandoned satellites, pieces of debris from satellite launches, and even tiny metal flecks from paint chips and frozen coolant. This accumulation of debris poses a threat to functioning satellites, spacecraft, and astronauts in space.
Space is considered a vacuum, so there is no air or atmosphere for pollutants to accumulate. However, near Earth, space debris such as defunct satellites and spent rocket stages can pose a hazard to active satellites and spacecraft. These objects can contribute to space pollution by increasing the risk of collisions and generating additional debris.
The amount of pollution a truck produces depends on factors like its age, engine type, and fuel efficiency. On average, a diesel truck can emit about 4.8 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year, along with other pollutants like nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. Electric trucks have zero tailpipe emissions, significantly reducing pollution.
satellites produce energy by the sun
satellite debris. caused by codling satellites and humans.
china
No. Construction equipment used to build the station will burn fossil fuels and produce some pollution. When the station is complete it will produce pollution free electricity. The station will require some electric power from the grid to operate, and some of that electricity may be produced by coal powered plants which do produce pollution, but the geothermal power station will not produce pollution.
They do not. They produce natural waste, which is far different then real pollution.
most do
Yes.
no
they do not produce pollution
No
No there are no satellites that the space program can reuse. This is why there is so much space and orbital debris in the solar system. Space and orbital debris means space and orbital junk or pollution.
What is space pollution what are it causes? & EFFECTS