yes
Geothermal energy is considered a renewable resource because it is derived from the heat of the Earth, which is continuously produced within the planet's core. This heat can be harnessed to generate electricity and heat buildings with minimal impact on the environment.
Minerals are generally considered non-renewable resources because they are formed over geological time scales and cannot be replenished within a human lifespan. Once they are extracted from the earth, they are no longer available.
Sulfur is considered a non-renewable resource because it is extracted from deposits in the earth's crust and once used, it can't be easily replaced within a human lifetime. It can be recycled and reused but is not produced naturally at a rate that can replenish what is extracted.
Geothermal energy is considered renewable because it is derived from the heat within the Earth's crust. As long as the Earth's core continues to generate heat, geothermal energy will be replenished.
Marble is considered a non-renewable resource because it is a type of rock that is formed over long periods of time through natural geological processes. Once it is mined and used, it cannot be easily replaced within a human lifetime.
Geothermal energy is considered a renewable resource because it is derived from the heat of the Earth, which is continuously produced within the planet's core. This heat can be harnessed to generate electricity and heat buildings with minimal impact on the environment.
yes..... renewable is better than non-renewable because you can renew it and it is better for the environment. :)
An energy resource is considered renewable if it can be naturally replenished within a human lifetime, such as sunlight, wind, or biomass. Factors that determine if a resource is renewable include its ability to regenerate quickly, its availability in abundance, and its minimal impact on the environment.
About the same as renewable resources, except that we cant renew the non renewable resources.
by using renewable resources we can save the environment. Most of the time non-renewable resources are bad for the environment by destroying the ozone. gas and coal are examples of non-renewable resources. another reason renewable resources are better is because they are well, renewable. that way we can never run out. examples would be hydroelectric, solar, and wind power
Because it just is :P
Because it just is :P
Yes, chlorine can be harmful to frogs and can potentially kill them if they are exposed to high levels of it in their environment.
Electricity generation if done by renewable resources is good. If done by non renewable is bad.
When an energy resource is renewable, it means that it can be naturally replenished within a human lifetime. This is important for sustainability because it ensures that the resource will not run out and can be used indefinitely without causing harm to the environment or depleting the Earth's natural resources.
It is renewable, and doesn't harm the environment.
Shouldn't they are made from a renewable resource