The evidence for global warming is now considered "exceptionally strong and beyond doubt" and actions this decade will determine the impact of climate change for the rest of the century .
Greenhouse gas emissions must peak and then begin to fall rapidly within the next few years if the world is to avoid dangerous warming of up to 7 degrees and beyond in his century. "If you leave the peaking year until 2020 you are going to have to reduce emissions at 9 per cent a year after that," Professor Will Steffen said. "I think this is almost impossible to do unless you put the economy on a war footing." This provides us with a clear incentive and advantage in doing something now to slow global warming while it is still possible without social and economic upheaval.
The only real disadvantage in doing something now to slow global warming is political. Politicians hate taking action that may have a short-term cost to anyone, but for which the greatest benefits will accrue after they have retired from political office.
Advantages: they're reliable; and they're not expensive. Disadvantages: they're bad for the environment; and the carbon dioxide from burning them is causing global warming.
yes... when people lotier instead of reusing something it causes global warming
Global Warming.
True global warming does not decrease temperatures. So, either the model for global warming's effects is hokus-pokus, or global warming as presently claimed, does not exist. Some global warming followers will have you believe that global warming makes the weather "act crazy". If true, then it is not really global warming, is it.
Global warming in itself isn't pollution - global warming is the gradual warming of the earth. However, global warming was caused by carbon dioxide pollution in the atmosphere, but global warming in itself isn't a pollution. yes it is a pollution
Advantages: they're reliable; and they're not expensive. Disadvantages: they're bad for the environment; and the carbon dioxide from burning them is causing global warming.
Advantages: they're reliable; and they're not expensive. Disadvantages: they're bad for the environment; and the carbon dioxide from burning them is causing global warming.
It is a renewable energy source. It donot increase global warming. it can be produced by waste material like "cow dung" and waste wood.
Exactly; when you consider the advantages and the disadvantages of anything (let us say, driving cars) you are talking about the good points (it gets you to your destination very efficiently) and the bad points (it contributes to air pollution and global warming). Advantages are the good points, the desirable features.
yes... when people lotier instead of reusing something it causes global warming
Global warming does not really affect ocean pollution. However, ocean pollution is something that is effecting global warming. This is because the pollutants are what is causing the warming trend.
stress full life and global warming
Global warming is a situation, in which, the temprature of the earth gets increase
haha nice
Advantages: Easy, Quick, Plenty of it (Renewable - You can grow more trees = more wood) Disadvantages: Takes long time to grow a large amount, cause pollution, breaking down of the ozone layer, GLOBAL WARMING... I'll let you think of some ;)
no
Advantages are global influences, a stategic alliance and regional growth opportunities. Disadvatages is possible threats to regional integration and development.