0
What else can I help you with?
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
The primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth is radiometric dating of rocks and fossils. By measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes within these materials, scientists can estimate their ages and establish a timeline for Earth's history that stretches back billions of years.
What are 2 of the 3 reasons that scientists believe the plates are moving?
Scientists believe that the plates are moving due to the evidence of seafloor spreading at mid-ocean ridges and the distribution of earthquakes along plate boundaries. Additionally, the study of paleomagnetism provides further support for the theory of plate tectonics.
What evidence do scientists have to support the idea that the continents were once one large land mass?
Scientists support the idea of a supercontinent called Pangaea through evidence such as matching coastlines, similar rock formations, and identical fossils found on different continents. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates, as recorded by magnetic anomalies in the ocean floor, provides further support for the theory of continental drift.
How do scientists support the concept of plate movement through evidence and research?
Scientists support the concept of plate movement through evidence and research by studying seismic activity, mapping the ocean floor, analyzing rock formations, and observing the distribution of fossils and plant remains across continents. These methods provide data that support the theory of plate tectonics, which explains how the Earth's lithosphere is divided into large, moving plates that interact at plate boundaries.
How long was it before new evidence emerged to support wegener's original theory?
It took several decades before new evidence emerged to support Wegener's original theory of continental drift. In the 1960s, significant discoveries such as seafloor spreading and plate tectonics provided strong evidence to confirm Wegener's ideas. This eventually led to the widespread acceptance of the theory of plate tectonics in the scientific community.
Why is a hypothesis that is unsupported by observation rejected by scientists?
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
Which scientists do not believe in ghosts?
Many scientists do not believe in ghosts because there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. Ghosts are generally seen as a phenomenon that falls more into the realm of culture, folklore, and belief systems rather than scientific inquiry. Scientists prioritize evidence-based explanations for the world around us, which typically do not include supernatural entities like ghosts.
What evidence do scientists have to support the relationships of the earths parts?
a. seismic waves b. volcanoes c. earthquakes d. rocks
Do scientist believe that bigfoot exsits?
Most scientists do not believe that Bigfoot exists, as there is no conclusive scientific evidence to support its existence. Claims of Bigfoot sightings and evidence have not been successfully validated through scientific investigation.
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
What evidence support spontaneous generation?
There was no evidence and still is none. Louis Pasteur along with countless other scientists have disproved the theory of spontaneous generation.
Why do you not believe in the existence of extraterrestrial life?
There is currently no conclusive evidence to support the existence of extraterrestrial life. Scientists continue to search for signs of life beyond Earth, but until concrete proof is found, many remain skeptical.
How has religion changed over time because of science?
Many religions have been changed overtime by scientific facts either supporting them or proving them wrong. For example, many scientists believe and support the hypothesis of evolution. Proven evidence may change the way someone looks on their own religion. If scientists found the holy grail and all other sorts of artifacts people would believe in Christianity more because of the evidence supporting it.
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
The primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth is radiometric dating of rocks and fossils. By measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes within these materials, scientists can estimate their ages and establish a timeline for Earth's history that stretches back billions of years.
What are 2 of the 3 reasons that scientists believe the plates are moving?
Scientists believe that the plates are moving due to the evidence of seafloor spreading at mid-ocean ridges and the distribution of earthquakes along plate boundaries. Additionally, the study of paleomagnetism provides further support for the theory of plate tectonics.
What evidence do scientists have to support the idea that the continents were once one large land mass?
Scientists support the idea of a supercontinent called Pangaea through evidence such as matching coastlines, similar rock formations, and identical fossils found on different continents. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates, as recorded by magnetic anomalies in the ocean floor, provides further support for the theory of continental drift.
Do you believe that this evidence gives support to the theory of evolution?
I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org
