0
What else can I help you with?
What are 2 of the 3 reasons that scientists believe the plates are moving?
Scientists believe that the plates are moving due to the evidence of seafloor spreading at mid-ocean ridges and the distribution of earthquakes along plate boundaries. Additionally, the study of paleomagnetism provides further support for the theory of plate tectonics.
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
The primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth is radiometric dating of rocks and fossils. By measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes within these materials, scientists can estimate their ages and establish a timeline for Earth's history that stretches back billions of years.
What evidence do scientists have to support the idea that the continents were once one large land mass?
Scientists support the idea of a supercontinent called Pangaea through evidence such as matching coastlines, similar rock formations, and identical fossils found on different continents. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates, as recorded by magnetic anomalies in the ocean floor, provides further support for the theory of continental drift.
How do scientists support the concept of plate movement through evidence and research?
Scientists support the concept of plate movement through evidence and research by studying seismic activity, mapping the ocean floor, analyzing rock formations, and observing the distribution of fossils and plant remains across continents. These methods provide data that support the theory of plate tectonics, which explains how the Earth's lithosphere is divided into large, moving plates that interact at plate boundaries.
What evidence leads some scientists to believe that there is no global warming or it is not caused by human activity?
There is no evidence proving global warming is not happening. A very tiny number of scientists (usually not climate scientists) try to find evidence but they have found nothing.There is a colossal amount of evidence proving it is happening:Temperature records rising and being broken.Sea levels rising.Ice caps and glaciers melting.Animal, bird and insect habitats changing.More unusual weather and more powerful storms.
Why is a hypothesis that is unsupported by observation rejected by scientists?
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
Which scientists do not believe in ghosts?
Many scientists do not believe in ghosts because there is no scientific evidence to support their existence. Ghosts are generally seen as a phenomenon that falls more into the realm of culture, folklore, and belief systems rather than scientific inquiry. Scientists prioritize evidence-based explanations for the world around us, which typically do not include supernatural entities like ghosts.
What evidence do scientists have to support the relationships of the earths parts?
a. seismic waves b. volcanoes c. earthquakes d. rocks
Do scientist believe that bigfoot exsits?
Most scientists do not believe that Bigfoot exists, as there is no conclusive scientific evidence to support its existence. Claims of Bigfoot sightings and evidence have not been successfully validated through scientific investigation.
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
What evidence support spontaneous generation?
There was no evidence and still is none. Louis Pasteur along with countless other scientists have disproved the theory of spontaneous generation.
How has religion changed over time because of science?
Many religions have been changed overtime by scientific facts either supporting them or proving them wrong. For example, many scientists believe and support the hypothesis of evolution. Proven evidence may change the way someone looks on their own religion. If scientists found the holy grail and all other sorts of artifacts people would believe in Christianity more because of the evidence supporting it.
Why do you not believe in the existence of extraterrestrial life?
There is currently no conclusive evidence to support the existence of extraterrestrial life. Scientists continue to search for signs of life beyond Earth, but until concrete proof is found, many remain skeptical.
What are 2 of the 3 reasons that scientists believe the plates are moving?
Scientists believe that the plates are moving due to the evidence of seafloor spreading at mid-ocean ridges and the distribution of earthquakes along plate boundaries. Additionally, the study of paleomagnetism provides further support for the theory of plate tectonics.
What is the primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth?
The primary source of evidence proposed by scientists to support the theory of an ancient Earth is radiometric dating of rocks and fossils. By measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes within these materials, scientists can estimate their ages and establish a timeline for Earth's history that stretches back billions of years.
What evidence do scientists have to support the idea that the continents were once one large land mass?
Scientists support the idea of a supercontinent called Pangaea through evidence such as matching coastlines, similar rock formations, and identical fossils found on different continents. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates, as recorded by magnetic anomalies in the ocean floor, provides further support for the theory of continental drift.
What do scientists believe provides evidence for the bid bang theory?
Scientists believe that several key pieces of evidence support the Big Bang theory, including the observed expansion of the universe, cosmic microwave background radiation, and the abundance of light elements like hydrogen and helium. The redshift of distant galaxies indicates that the universe is expanding, while the cosmic microwave background radiation is thought to be the afterglow of the initial explosion. Additionally, the proportions of light elements align with predictions made by Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Together, these observations provide strong support for the theory.
