In the Genesis creation account mankind is appointed as a "caretaker" over the creation of God. It is clear that this involves what scholars call the "dominion mandate" in that man has control and authority over the environment to use it as he sees fit. Obviously if he exploits the environment over which he has been entrusted dominion, to the point of damage he is not exercising responsible stewardship.
Since the environment is God's creation and not man's, man is not free to use it in ways that cause harm either to the environment or that hampers the right of others to live in an environment that is healthy.
The creation account sums up the whole creation, which God describes in Genesis 1:31 as "very good". We know today a great deal more today than then about what this means - the amazing diversity and complexity in both the environment as a whole and in individual organisms, body systems, interactions, information content etc. Belief in an orderly creation has been shown to stimulate and encourage scientific inquiry, as well as technological advancement -all of which have led to knowledge which enables better care for the environment.
Some colleges with a young earth creationist perspective include Liberty University, Bob Jones University, and Cedarville University. These institutions often offer programs or courses that align with this belief system, such as creation science or biblical studies.
Creationists teach that the world was created roughly 6000 years ago [4004BC (Bishop Ussher's date of creation) + 2008 yrs 6012 years ago] as of this date in 2008.ANSWERThe simplistic answer to this question is that the earth was created in 4004BC and since it's 2015 now it is 6018 years old [note: no year zero between 1BC and 1AD] meaning that the earth and everything on it and the whole entire universe is roughly 6000 years old.However, it's more complicated than that!The relevant verses quoted are:-Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.-Genesis 1 :2 Now the earth was without shape and empty.......However, these verses are actually English translations of the Hebrew wordsThere was more than one creation: there were actually two.:-The FIRST was when God created the entire universe (including earth) for Lucifer and the angels some time in the past.[ Lucifer was put in charge of all this. The universe was created to be run by and suitable for angels. However, Lucifer rebelled, his name was changed to Satan and the angels who followed him became demons, and the entire universe (including earth) was wrecked and rendered barren in judgement.]The SECOND was when God then started all over again and re-created the earth so it was suitable for Man and to be ruled by Man {Adam}.[ Satan didn't want to give up his realm so made Adam surrender it by causing him to sin, and then Jesus Christ - the second Adam - took it back again, but that's a different story!].In summaryThe earth was re-created 6000 years ago, but it was originally created long before then.That is why there are two different times for the ages of the earth and the universe: scientists have calculated that while the universe is 13.8 Billion years old the Earth is only 4.6 Billion.All Creation Scientists, whether YEC or OEC accept these dates to one degree or the other.For explanatory details and verification of the above, see:-(1) The first relevant verse and translation notes in NET Bible:-:-Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.The English word "created" is a translation of the Hebrew word 'bara' and really means the universe and earth was not created out of nothing in 4004BC but rather was re-created in 4004BC.For verification see NET Bible reference notes on Genesis 1:1:-The English verb "create" captures well the meaning of the Hebrew term in this context. The verb (bara') always describes the divine activity of fashioning something new, fresh, and perfect. The verb does not necessarily describe creation out of nothing... it often stresses forming anew, reforming, renewing(2) The second relevant verse and translation notes in NET Bible:-:-Genesis 1 :2 Now the earth was without shape and empty.......For verification see NET Bible reference notes on Genesis 1:2:-Some translate 1:2a "and the earth became," arguing that v. 1 describes the original creation of the earth, while v. 2 refers to a judgment that reduced it to a chaotic condition. Verses 3ff. then describe the re-creation of the earth. ...... The words describe a condition that is without form and empty. What we now know as "the earth" was actually an unfilled mass covered by water and darkness.(3) Also See the very detailed and unbiased article "Is There a Gap Between Genesis One Verse 1 and 2?" by : Arnold Mendez ]
Esperanza's papa taught her to respect and appreciate the earth. He showed her the importance of caring for the land and understanding the connection between people and the environment. He instilled in her a sense of responsibility to protect and nurture the earth for future generations.
Yes, schools should recycle to reduce waste, conserve natural resources, and teach students about the importance of environmental sustainability. By incorporating recycling programs, schools can contribute to a cleaner and healthier environment for future generations.
Environmental science teachers typically work in classrooms, laboratories, and outdoor field settings to teach students about various environmental concepts and issues. They may also collaborate with other educators, researchers, and environmental professionals to develop curriculum and conduct research projects. Additionally, they may participate in community outreach efforts and educational programs to raise awareness about environmental conservation and sustainability.
The first creation story in Genesis (verses 1:1-2:4a) teaches that man was to subdue the earth and have dominion over every other living thing. This story ends with the creation of man (both male and female) in God's image.The second creation story in Genesis (verses 2:4b-25) teaches that man was the servant of the land, to till the soil (verse 2:5) and to dress it and keep it (2:15). This story begins with the creation of man, after which God recognises Adam's need for companionship.
The creation story teaches us that humans were given the responsibility to take care of the Earth and all its creatures, showing us the importance of stewardship. It highlights our role as caretakers of the environment, emphasizing the need to act responsibly in the preservation and protection of our planet for future generations.
It is accepted by many in the US, and rejected by others. Most of those who reject evolution are on the Christian Right, rejecting it in favor of a literal interpretation of the biblical creation story. Outside of the Christian Right, most Americans who care about the Bible accept the idea that the creation story in Genesis is not intended to replace or supplant science, but rather, it should be read as a parable, to teach us about our place in the world.
AnswerThe first creation story (Genesis 1:1-2:4a) is from the Priestly Source, who wrote during the Babylonian Exile. This story has parallels to the Babylonians creation myths and the emphasis on the sea ('the deep') suggests that it originated in a maritime environment, which is what Babylon was. The second creation story is from the Yahwist Source, who wrote from the early Judahite point of view (the Elohist Source wrote different material, from an Israelite point of view). Judah was only a small, inland enclave and the sea does not get a mention, but there is an emphasis on the need for rain. This shows that over time, before it became part of the Book of Genesis, the second story was culturally adapted by the Judahites.The serpent of the second creation story was a very widespread motif in Near Eastern creation myths. The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil and the Tree of Life were also very common in in Near Eastern religious beliefs. We know from Greek sources that the Greek myths were not necessarily meant to be read literally, but rather that they were meant to instruct the faithful in the ways of the gods or to teach moral truths; this was probably also the case with Near Eastern peoples. And so it was with the story of Adama and Eve. Leon R. Kass (The Beginning of Wisdom: Reading Genesis) believes that the story was meant to teach moral truths, not the history of our beginnings.Asaph Sagiv believes that there is an Egyptian antecedent to the story of Cain and Abel. He suggests that the Cain and Abel story represents a biblical countermyth to the Egyptian story of Osiris and his brother Seth. In that story, Seth, an evil god of the nomads, kills Osiris, the Egyptian god of the earth's fertility. In Genesis, Cain (an Osiris figure) offers a cult sacrifice (Abel) to the earth; the Lord curses the ground for accepting the victim's blood and banishes Cain from his divine presence; and Seth appears as a substitute for the nomadic victim whose sacrifice the biblical God preferred.
Creationism is not science, and to teach it in science classes would be misleading. For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
A:There are two different creation stories in the Book of Genesis (verses 1:1-2:4a and 2:4b-25). A key theme of both is that God created life on earth. In the first creation story, God also created the light of day, the firmament that separates the waters above from the waters below, and the sun, moon and stars. In the first creation story, man is made in the image of God, while in the second story he becomes god-like after his transgression (Genesis 3:22: "now the man is become like one of us").The creation stories do not teach us about the natural world because, for example, the first story teaches that the sun, moon and stars were created after the earth existed and grass already grew, which we now know not to have been the case.The creation stories do not really address the relationship between God and humans. However, the stories both say, in somewhat different ways, that God created us, in which case it could be said that God is to be obeyed.
Science teaches how the universe is believed to have originated, how the stars were formed and the planets, including our own planet earth, came to be. It teaches what living things existed long ago and how some became extinct due to changes in their environment, and others evolved to adapt to those changes in their environment. It does not teach precisely how the first life form came into existence, although it does provide several hypotheses that could explain the ultimate origin of life.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Christianity and Hinduism both teach that as people we should look after the environment. Because Christians believe God created everything and in Genesis chapter 2 verse 15 commanded us to protect and tend to His creation. In other words we were put in charge of it. While Hinduism teaches that when we die, some may reincarnate as animals, such as cattle, and so we need to care for all creatures.
The message of the two accounts of creation in the book of Genesis is that God created the world and everything in it. The first account emphasizes God's power and majesty in creating the universe in six days, while the second account focuses more on the intimacy of God's relationship with humanity and the special creation of Adam and Eve. Together, these accounts teach that God is the ultimate creator and sustainer of all life.
it teaches them that god is power full and can do anything
A:The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was a widespread motif in ancient Near Eastern creation myths, so it was probably inevitable that the same motif would be adopted in Hebrew creation. Leon R. Kass (The Beginning of Wisdom: Reading Genesis) says that we can learn most from the story by regarding it as a mythical yet realistic portrait of permanent truths about our humanity, not as a historical account. The story of Adam and Eve was originally intended to teach a moral lesson, and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was essential to imparting that lesson.
A story is the perfect way to teach good grammar. The author only has to use good grammar in the story.