0
What geologic discovery in the 1960's provided the scientific evidence to verify the occurrence of continental drift?
The discovery was the presence of magnetic stripes on the ocean floor which indicated that the seafloor was spreading, solidifying from melt, and the magnetic minerals contained therein were aligning themselves with the magnetic alignment of the Earth at the time of their solidification.
What else can I help you with?
What evidence convinced many geologists that the continents were slowly moving?
The discovery of matching geological formations and fossils on different continents, as well as the fit of the continental margins, provided compelling evidence for the theory of continental drift. Additionally, the discovery of mid-ocean ridges and magnetic striping on the ocean floor supported the idea of plate tectonics and the movement of the continents.
How would you disprove the theory of continental drift?
The theory of continental drift has been well-supported by evidence from various fields such as paleontology, geology, and paleoclimatology. To disprove it, one would need to provide strong evidence that contradicts the observed patterns of continental fit, matching geological formations across continents, distribution of fossils, and other supporting data. However, to date, no such evidence exists to conclusively disprove the theory of continental drift.
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
What discovery caused scientists to rethink wegeners continental drift theory?
The discovery of mid-ocean ridges and the process of seafloor spreading in the 1960s caused scientists to rethink Wegener's theory of continental drift. This new evidence provided a mechanism for how continents could move apart and lent support to the concept of plate tectonics as the driving force behind the movement of Earth's lithospheric plates.
What scientific evidence supports the theory of Pangaea?
Scientific evidence supporting the theory of Pangaea includes the fit of the continents' coastlines, similarities in rock formations and geological structures across continents, and matching fossil evidence of ancient plants and animals. Additionally, the distribution of certain species among continents and the discovery of mid-ocean ridges and plate tectonics further support the concept of Pangaea.
What 1960's scientific evidence verified the occurrence of the continental drift?
In the 1960s, scientific evidence from studies of paleomagnetism, seismic activity, and ocean floor mapping supported the occurrence of continental drift. This evidence provided crucial support for the theory of plate tectonics, which explains how the Earth's continents move and interact on the surface.
What geologic discovery in the 1960 provided the evidence to verify the occurrence of continental drift?
The discovery was the presence of magnetic stripes on the ocean floor which indicated that the seafloor was spreading, solidifying from melt, and the magnetic minerals contained therein were aligning themselves with the magnetic alignment of the Earth at the time of their solidification.
A scientific explanation of natural occurrence is called?
A scientific explanation of a natural occurrence is called a theory or a hypothesis, depending on the level of evidence and support behind it. Theories are well-established explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while hypotheses are proposed explanations that require further testing and evidence to confirm.
Why didn't the scientific world believe Alfred Wegener and continental drift?
Lack of evidence
What evidence convinced many geologists that the continents were slowly moving?
The discovery of matching geological formations and fossils on different continents, as well as the fit of the continental margins, provided compelling evidence for the theory of continental drift. Additionally, the discovery of mid-ocean ridges and magnetic striping on the ocean floor supported the idea of plate tectonics and the movement of the continents.
How did the world react to Marie Tharp's new discovery?
Marie Tharp's new discovery of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge was initially met with skepticism by the scientific community, as her findings challenged existing theories of plate tectonics. However, as more evidence emerged supporting her mapping of the ocean floor, her work was eventually accepted and revolutionized the field of geology. Tharp's discovery provided crucial evidence for the theory of continental drift and plate tectonics.
Why is the continental drift theory a theory and not a scientific law?
The Continental Drift theory is a theory because there is no evidence to support it. Alfred Wegener developed the Continental Drift theory in the 1800's.
What evidence didn't Wegnerhave access to at the time?
Evidence for continental drift, now called tectonics, arrived with the discovery of the mid-ocean ridge, where new crust is being created.
Which scientists work provided evidence of moving continents making the continental drift theory accepted by the scientific community?
Henry Hess
The discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation and primordial helium gas was scientific evidence supporting what theory?
The 'big bang' theory.
Is the claim that Lucy is a hoax supported by scientific evidence?
No, the claim that Lucy is a hoax is not supported by scientific evidence. Lucy, the fossil of a hominid species called Australopithecus afarensis, has been extensively studied and is widely accepted as a legitimate discovery in the field of paleoanthropology.
How would you disprove the theory of continental drift?
The theory of continental drift has been well-supported by evidence from various fields such as paleontology, geology, and paleoclimatology. To disprove it, one would need to provide strong evidence that contradicts the observed patterns of continental fit, matching geological formations across continents, distribution of fossils, and other supporting data. However, to date, no such evidence exists to conclusively disprove the theory of continental drift.
