The ecosystem crashes and essentially everything dies. It is purely Darwinistic at this point. The strongest will survive because of competition for food and shelter. But even the strongest will struggle because of the intense competition for food. So, in short, the ecosystem will essentially collapse with massive fallout.
When a population overshoots carrying capacity, there is usually a decline in resources leading to increased competition, which can result in high mortality rates, decreased birth rates, and emigration. As the population recovers and stabilizes, there is typically a period of slow growth as individuals compete for resources, which eventually leads to a balance between available resources and population size.
After decomposers consume dead organisms, the minerals in the organism's tissues are released back into the environment as nutrients. These nutrients can then be recycled and taken up by plants, starting the nutrient cycle again.
It will likely descend into warfare as happened on Easter Island, and savagery will continue until the population drops below whatever remains of the carrying capacity. However, the warfare may also diminish both the human resources and Natural Resources and infrastructure to the point that no meaningful recovery is possible. Think TSE's "not with a bang, but a whimper".
Its Evolution, so it is to make the species more adapted to its environment, all animals go through evolution, but some do stop for a while if there is no need for the animal to no longer adapt, and is sutible for its environment already. for example, if polar bears were not near snow, and instead in Africa, everntually there coats will no longer be white, and become less thick.
When plants and animals die, the carbon in their bodies is released back into the environment in different ways. Some of it is released as carbon dioxide through decomposition and respiration, some is stored in the soil, and some may be incorporated into new life forms through the food chain. Ultimately, the carbon cycle ensures that carbon is continuously recycled between living organisms and the environment.
then the organisms must compete for living space The population will decrease.
The population continues to grow.
Carrying capacity is the maximum number of individuals that an environment can sustainably support. If a population exceeds the carrying capacity of its environment, resources like food, water, and shelter become limited, leading to competition, scarcity, and population decline through factors like starvation, disease, or migration.
Eventually the organisms will die because they would die of thirst beacause there wouldn't be any water for them to drink. (:
The population levels off at the carrying capacity.
The population continues to grow.
Brain failure
basically the size of a population can only grow to equal the amount of resources the environment can provide (carrying capacity). So if there arent many resources in an area and too large of a population, then there will be starvation and fight for resources. But if there is an overabundance of resources and the carrying capacity is very high, then the population will grow till it falls under its own weight. It's the cirlce of life.
If a population has not reached its carrying capacity, it will continue to grow and expand. Resources will be plentiful and competition for food, water, and space will be minimal. This can lead to rapid population growth until the carrying capacity is reached.
They might die :(
Nutrients are constantly being passed between organisms and the environment. This happens when decomposers break down the dead organisms putting it back in the soil.
starvation increases to the point where this population is maintained.