0
Pangaea is what scientists believe to be the orgin of all continents on Earth. Based on the borders of the continents we have today, it does seems that you can fit them all together into one large landmass. Scientists later found other evidences such as fossils of the same animals on to different continent border which are separated by miles of water and similar mountain ranges. They figured that there was a "supercontinent" and called it Pangaea. ALthough at first they didn't believe it would not be possible to move the continents, the calculated force seemed impossible to happen. Only later on did they discover that sea-floor spreading was the cause for the separation of Pagaea. Sea-flooring spreading moved the floor of the ocean and the continents along with it.moon rocks have shown that the moon is made of only the superficial layers of the earths crust . the moon may have been created as a fragment of a a collision wifh a huge body the result being the creation of the moon as part flew off into orbit and the rest adhered to the earth to be Pangaea an island
of solid matter in the center of the water cover earth.
What else can I help you with?
What evidence prove that Pangaea didn't existed?
Evidence such as the distribution of fossils, rock formations, and magnetic fields on different continents support the theory of continental drift and the breakup of Pangaea. The matching geological features, such as mountain ranges and coastlines, on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean provide further evidence that the continents were once connected. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates and the ongoing process of plate tectonics help explain the separation of the continents from Pangaea.
Is Pangaea theory true?
Yes, the theory of Pangaea is supported by geological evidence which shows that the Earth's landmasses were once connected in a supercontinent about 335 million years ago. The idea is widely accepted in the scientific community as a plausible explanation for the arrangement of continents on Earth.
Does the climate prove that Pangaea is real?
The existence of Pangaea, the supercontinent that existed over 290 million years ago, is supported by various lines of evidence such as the matching shapes of continents and similarities in rock formations and fossils found across continents. Climate data, including evidence from ancient glaciations and sedimentary rocks, also supports the theory of Pangaea. These pieces of evidence help scientists reconstruct the past positions of continents and understand Earth's geological history.
Why is Pangaea important to understand?
Understanding Pangaea is important because it provides evidence for the theory of plate tectonics, which explains the movement of Earth's lithospheric plates. The breakup of Pangaea has influenced the distribution of continents and oceans, as well as the evolution of life on Earth. Studying Pangaea helps scientists understand the Earth's geological history and predict future changes in the planet's landscape.
What are the three things Alfred Wegener used to prove his theory about pangaea?
Alfred Wegener used evidence from fossil records, similarities in rock formations across continents, and matching geological features as evidence to support his theory of Pangaea. These observations led him to propose the idea of continental drift, suggesting that the continents were once joined together as a single landmass.
What evidence may be called to prove that there once existed a super continent called Pangaea?
Evidence to prove the existence of the supercontinent Pangaea includes fossil evidence of similar plant and animal species across continents, the matching shapes of coastlines and mountain ranges on different continents, and the distribution of ancient rock formations that line up when continents are fitted together. Additionally, geological evidence such as rock layers and paleoclimatic data also supports the theory of Pangaea's existence.
What evidence prove that Pangaea didn't existed?
Evidence such as the distribution of fossils, rock formations, and magnetic fields on different continents support the theory of continental drift and the breakup of Pangaea. The matching geological features, such as mountain ranges and coastlines, on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean provide further evidence that the continents were once connected. Additionally, the movement of tectonic plates and the ongoing process of plate tectonics help explain the separation of the continents from Pangaea.
What forms of evidence were used to help gather evidence for the existence of pangaea?
Plate tectonics led to the theory of Pangaea.
Is Pangaea theory true?
Yes, the theory of Pangaea is supported by geological evidence which shows that the Earth's landmasses were once connected in a supercontinent about 335 million years ago. The idea is widely accepted in the scientific community as a plausible explanation for the arrangement of continents on Earth.
What is mean by expulcatory?
Exculpatory evidence at trial is evidence which helps to prove the innocence of the person on trial. The opposite word is inculpatory, evidence which proves his guilt.
Does the climate prove that Pangaea is real?
The existence of Pangaea, the supercontinent that existed over 290 million years ago, is supported by various lines of evidence such as the matching shapes of continents and similarities in rock formations and fossils found across continents. Climate data, including evidence from ancient glaciations and sedimentary rocks, also supports the theory of Pangaea. These pieces of evidence help scientists reconstruct the past positions of continents and understand Earth's geological history.
What is the climatological evidence for Pangaea's existence?
Egghead Egghead
Why is Pangaea important to understand?
Understanding Pangaea is important because it provides evidence for the theory of plate tectonics, which explains the movement of Earth's lithospheric plates. The breakup of Pangaea has influenced the distribution of continents and oceans, as well as the evolution of life on Earth. Studying Pangaea helps scientists understand the Earth's geological history and predict future changes in the planet's landscape.
What is an example of geologic evidence?
This question is simply too general, but i'll give you the definition and an example of the geological evidence of Pangaea.Definition: evidence that geologically prove the existant of such theory inrelation to being of the past (on most occaisions)A geological example of evidence of the existant of Pangaea is how there are coal mines in Antarctica. Coal mines only form near the equator, therefore proving that continental shift was involved and that there was once a "Pangaea".
What are the three things Alfred Wegener used to prove his theory about pangaea?
Alfred Wegener used evidence from fossil records, similarities in rock formations across continents, and matching geological features as evidence to support his theory of Pangaea. These observations led him to propose the idea of continental drift, suggesting that the continents were once joined together as a single landmass.
What forms of science were used to help gather evidence for the existence of Pangaea?
Geology, paleontology, and paleoclimatology were used to gather evidence for the existence of Pangaea. These sciences helped researchers study the geological formations, fossil records, and ancient climate patterns across different continents to reconstruct the supercontinent Pangaea.
If you traveled five hundred years into the past and with nothing from this time could you prove you were from this time?
To prove something you need proof, and proof is defined as ,"any factual evidence that helps to establish the truth of something", and evidence is an actual visual thing, and if you have NOTHING that is visual of and actual object, you cannot prove it, so no.
