Organic compounds that have identical molecular formulas but different structural formulas are called isomers.
Molecules that have identical molecular formulas but the atoms in each molecule are arranged differently are called isomers.
The problem with giving molecular formulas for organic compounds is that it could be lots of different things. Nothing with that particular molecular formula is leaping to mind as a most likely candidate.
No, none of the given formulas are consistent with empirical formulas because they do not represent the simplest whole-number ratio of elements in a compound. The empirical formula shows the relative number of each type of atom in a compound and is reduced to its simplest form.
Structural formulas show a representation of the molecular structure, while chemical formulas do not. This is especially important when multiple compounds have the same chemical formula, but a different molecular structure.
Two compounds that have the same molecular formula but different structural formulas are isomers. Isomers are compounds with the same number and types of atoms but arranged differently. An example is ethanol (C2H6O) and dimethyl ether (C2H6O), both have the same molecular formula but different structural formulas.
Molecules that have identical molecular formulas but the atoms in each molecule are arranged differently are called isomers.
A molecular formula lists the numbers of the atoms of a specific element in a compound. A structural formula is a picture of how the atoms in a specific molecule are connected, with each atom represented by its chemical symbol. For example, oxygen's molecular formula is O2. Its structural formula is O-O.
An empirical formula is elaborated after the chemical analysis of a compound; for a structural formula more in depth studies are necessary.
A molecular formula is identical to the empirical formula, and is based on quantity of atoms of each type in the compound.The relationship between empirical and molecular formula is that the empirical formula is the simplest formula, and the molecular can be the same as the empirical, or some multiple of it. An example might be an empirical formula of C3H8. Its molecular formula may be C3H8 , C6H16, C9H24, etc. Looking at it the other way, if the molecular formula is C6H12O6, the empirical formula would be CH2O.
A molecular formula is identical to the empirical formula, and is based on quantity of atoms of each type in the compound.The relationship between empirical and molecular formula is that the empirical formula is the simplest formula, and the molecular can be the same as the empirical, or some multiple of it. An example might be an empirical formula of C3H8. Its molecular formula may be C3H8 , C6H16, C9H24, etc. Looking at it the other way, if the molecular formula is C6H12O6, the empirical formula would be CH2O.
Yes, prefixes are not considered when writing formulas for molecular compounds. The subscripts in a molecular formula represent the ratio of atoms in the compound without taking into account any prefixes used to indicate the number of each element.
Ionic compounds do not have molecular formulas. Instead, they have empirical formulas that represent the simplest whole-number ratio of ions in the compound. Ionic compounds are formed by the combination of positive and negative ions held together by electrostatic forces.
Molecular formulas are used the most often, but empirical formulas do help at times. Often it's just to simplify the molecular formula, but this simplification can often tell you if it's in the same chemical family as other compounds and such.
Molecular compounds are formed by sharing of electrons between atoms, resulting in covalent bonds, while ionic compounds are formed by transferring electrons from one atom to another, resulting in ionic bonds. Molecular compounds have discrete molecules with defined molecular formulas, while ionic compounds do not have discrete molecules and are represented by empirical formulas showing the ratio of ions present in the compound.
Once you get into the realm of compounds you are really looking at two types---ionic and molecular. Molecular compounds are made up of all the same type of molecule, and those molecules consist of a series of atoms covalently bonded together. The molecular formula of a molecular compound gives the number of each type of atom that makes up the molecule. Ionic compounds are different---there are no definable molecules present, just lattices of alternating positive and negative ions (charged atoms). So unlike molecular compounds there is no definable subunit in an ionic compound. Instead ionic compounds are represented by the simplest ratio of ions in the compound. For instance, in table salt there is one sodium ion per chlorine ion so the formula is NaCl. that does not mean there are little NaCl molecules making up the compound, just that the ratio of those two ions is 1:1. In calcium chloride there are two chloride ions for every calcium ion, so its formula is CaCl2. So the simple answe to the question is that molecular formulas are not used for ionic compounds because they are not comprised of molecules. That does not keep people (even chemists) from referring to the formulas of ionic compounds as "molecular formulas" but it is technically a misnomer. Simply calling them "formulas" or "ionic formulas" would be more appropriate.
The empirical formula of a compound shows the lowest whole number ratio of the elements in that compound; AKA simplest formula. The molecular formula describes the number of atoms of each element that make up the molecule or formula unit; AKA actual formula
The pair of formulas that represents the same compound is H2O and H-O-H. Both formulas represent a water molecule, where one oxygen atom is connected to two hydrogen atoms.