An observation is something that you see, hear, smell, or taste while an inference is something that you assumefrom an observation. In other words, you don't actually seethe inference while you can observe, or see the object.
That statement is an observation since it directly describes a measurable fact about the temperature at noon without drawing any conclusions or making assumptions.
no because how can you explain an observation without making one
Sure, people do it all the time.Whether it's logical to do so is a different question.
A. Observation Observation is the use of the senses to gather and record information about structures or processes in nature. (:
You are making a prediction or an inference about the weather based on the observation of dark clouds in the sky.
Observation is stating a given fact that has nothing to do with your opinion. In contrast to that an inference is when you make an assumptions based on your INTERPRETATION of a fact.
state why an observation cannot be an inference
state why an observation cannot be an inference
I think An observation about that inference is about that object.
observation is observation! :)inference is inference! :)Assuming you meant "Differentiate observation from inference ?" !....Observation is the act of being able to physically see an object - inference is implying something is real without physical proof of its existence.Incidentally - why was this put into the category 'animal life' !
inference
Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.
Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.
inference
no
A observation
It is an inference