0
Whether it is viewed as a hoax or just bad science is up to the individual. There is evidence that the planet has indeed warmed over the past 10,000 plus years. Some problems withe the current science would include (but not limited to)
- CO2 levels have never caused temp change historically. Every global temperature decrease has occurred during high CO2 levels and vice versa.
- There is evidence that CO2 levels above 200ppm are above the saturation levels of the planet thus no additional warming would occur if the levels were above this.
- There are over 90,000 science measurements that show that pre 1900 levels of CO2 were often above 400 pp
- Man produces less than 0.03% of all green house gas
- Man produces less then 7% of all CO2. Much of that CO2 comes from objects that would produce CO2 whether used by man or not.
- The current warming trend started this cycle about 10,000 years ago.
- The starting point for the trend blamed on man was a low point in recent temps known as the mini ice age.
- Most of our warming occurred before 1934. Since the temps of 1934 we have seen less than 0.2 degrees of warming.
- Even the IPCC does not blame man for ALL warming like many do. They say that man is partially to blame.
- Climate gate and other issues have caught climate experts on the dole forging and misrepresenting temperatures.
- Many Government funded climate experts illegally refuse to allow access to government funded data.
- When the numbers are verified, many climate experts values do not ring true.
- The sea level rise is not following the predicted path. In fact it is about normal for the past few centuries.
- Temperature rise is not consistent, despite the requirement of it being consistent if we are consistently adding warmth.
- The IPCC (the United Nations economic panel on climate change) admits that solar variation is still not understood as it interacts with climate change.
- There has not been an increase, as predicted, in hurricanes or major storms.
- Models for climate change have all ignored water vapors negative feedbacks and thus always fail to meet real world projections. (Water vapor is the main green house gas)
- Water vapor is the greatest driver of warming. CO2 makes up less than 10% of the warming in many studies. Worst case is 25%.
What else can I help you with?
How is Global Warming a Scam?
The science of global warming could be a scam if someone had anything to gain by it. Yet scientists resisted the idea that they should be concerned about the possibility for almost a century after the possibility of anthropogenic global warming was first identified. No scientist has anything to gain by creating a hoax. In fact, any evidence that a research scientist has engaged in a scam would be career-destroying.
How is the government getting money from the global warming hoax?
Oh honey, the government isn't making money from a "global warming hoax." They're actually funding initiatives to combat climate change and protect the environment. So, if you're looking for a conspiracy theory, you'll have to search elsewhere because this one's as dry as last week's toast.
Do meteorologists believe in global warming and its impact on weather patterns?
Yes, the majority of meteorologists believe in global warming and its impact on weather patterns. They use scientific evidence and data to support this belief.
Is greenhouse effect is the other name of global warming?
Strictly speaking there is no other name for global warming."The whole earth heating up" might be another name.Global warming is causing climate change, so many people think they are both the same, so they say:"Climate change is another name for global warming", but they are not really the same.
What proof is there for global warming being a lie?
No scientist has anything to gain by creating a hoax or deliberately lying to say that average global temperatures are rising - the normal definition of global warming. In fact, any evidence that a research scientist has engaged in this would be career-destroying. The only employment open to trained scientists who value propaganda over research is in some sections of industry, but it is unlikely that any business would seek to create belief in global warming. However, Richard Muller, a Physics Professor and longtime critic of government-led climate studies believed that there was an inadvertent lie behind the science of global warming. He sought to address what he called "the legitimate concerns" of sceptics who believe global warming is exaggerated and undertook what was termed the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project at the University of California, Berkeley, to demonstrate that there was at least some poor science involved. Professor Muller unexpectedly told a congressional hearing the work of the three principal groups that have analysed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent ... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups." Thus the only potential proof that global warming was in some way a lie foundered.
What evidence do global warming deniers give that global warming is a hoax?
1) if the ice melts in the northern/ southern region of the world, the water level wont rise. BECAUSE that water is froze, it is expanded.
What are fluorocarbons?
Something made up by Liberals to scare you into believing the hoax of global warming.
What is two pieces of evidence that English is the global?
global warming?
Is global warming warming the greatest danger to brown bears?
No, not at all. There is no evidence that the global warming is affecting brown bears.
How is Global Warming a Scam?
The science of global warming could be a scam if someone had anything to gain by it. Yet scientists resisted the idea that they should be concerned about the possibility for almost a century after the possibility of anthropogenic global warming was first identified. No scientist has anything to gain by creating a hoax. In fact, any evidence that a research scientist has engaged in a scam would be career-destroying.
What evidence is there that global warming is a myth?
There is no evidence that global warming is a myth. There has certainly been a lot of misinformation on the subject, often from vested interests, but the clear consensus of climate scientists is that global warming is real and that human activities are substantially the cause of global warming since the Industrial Revolution.
Why does global warming affect the migration pattern of birds?
There is no evidence that "global warming" is causing birds to migrate differently.
Would polar bears in Mexico be evidence for global warming?
No, that would probably be evidence for global cooling.
What was John Browne's position on global warming?
On May 19, 1997, in a speech at Stanford University, Browne declared that evidence suggested that global warming could be real. He argued that evidence that burning of fossil fuels was contributing to global warming
What pressure groups are critical of the evidence of global warming?
Extremely conservative groups tend to be more critical of the evidence of global warming. This has more to do ideology than idiocy, even though over 97% of scientists acknowledge the existence of of global warming.
How is the government getting money from the global warming hoax?
Oh honey, the government isn't making money from a "global warming hoax." They're actually funding initiatives to combat climate change and protect the environment. So, if you're looking for a conspiracy theory, you'll have to search elsewhere because this one's as dry as last week's toast.
Why is the hoax of man-made global warming being pushed by some of the Senators and Congressman of the United States?
They understand the seriousness of global warming and they want to leave the world a better place for their children and grandchildren.
