Whether it is viewed as a hoax or just bad science is up to the individual. There is evidence that the planet has indeed warmed over the past 10,000 plus years. Some problems withe the current science would include (but not limited to)
There is no evidence that global warming is a hoax. Do you imagine that every country and government in the world has been hoaxed, as they have all signed the Paris 2015 Climate Agreement? Who is hoaxing them? Martians?
Governments are not getting money, they are spending money. Global warming is no hoax and governments have to spend money if there is any way of stopping it.
The science of global warming could be a scam if someone had anything to gain by it. Yet scientists resisted the idea that they should be concerned about the possibility for almost a century after the possibility of anthropogenic global warming was first identified. No scientist has anything to gain by creating a hoax. In fact, any evidence that a research scientist has engaged in a scam would be career-destroying.
There is no evidence that global warming is affecting meerkats yet. However the warming is gradually affecting the food chains and habitats of many animals. If this happens, the animals have to migrate, adapt or die.
Strictly speaking there is no other name for global warming."The whole earth heating up" might be another name.Global warming is causing climate change, so many people think they are both the same, so they say:"Climate change is another name for global warming", but they are not really the same.
Global Warming.
1) if the ice melts in the northern/ southern region of the world, the water level wont rise. BECAUSE that water is froze, it is expanded.
Governments are not getting money, they are spending money. Global warming is no hoax and governments have to spend money if there is any way of stopping it.
Something made up by Liberals to scare you into believing the hoax of global warming.
global warming?
No, not at all. There is no evidence that the global warming is affecting brown bears.
The science of global warming could be a scam if someone had anything to gain by it. Yet scientists resisted the idea that they should be concerned about the possibility for almost a century after the possibility of anthropogenic global warming was first identified. No scientist has anything to gain by creating a hoax. In fact, any evidence that a research scientist has engaged in a scam would be career-destroying.
There is no evidence that global warming is a myth. There has certainly been a lot of misinformation on the subject, often from vested interests, but the clear consensus of climate scientists is that global warming is real and that human activities are substantially the cause of global warming since the Industrial Revolution.
There is no evidence that "global warming" is causing birds to migrate differently.
No, that would probably be evidence for global cooling.
On May 19, 1997, in a speech at Stanford University, Browne declared that evidence suggested that global warming could be real. He argued that evidence that burning of fossil fuels was contributing to global warming
Extremely conservative groups tend to be more critical of the evidence of global warming. This has more to do ideology than idiocy, even though over 97% of scientists acknowledge the existence of of global warming.
They understand the seriousness of global warming and they want to leave the world a better place for their children and grandchildren.