Most likely an ecologist or meteorologist.
There is a specific degree called climatologist.
The science of global warming could be a scam if someone had anything to gain by it. Yet scientists resisted the idea that they should be concerned about the possibility for almost a century after the possibility of anthropogenic global warming was first identified. No scientist has anything to gain by creating a hoax. In fact, any evidence that a research scientist has engaged in a scam would be career-destroying.
meteorology
It would be global cooling.
If god was real he would have stopped gloobal warming.
Tides are the result of gravitational forces between the Earth and moon. Global warming would little effect on tidal patterns although sea levels can be affected by global warming.
The most valid way to study global warming is through history. Scientists observe the past occurances of climate, environment, atmosphere, etc., to understand the way global warming is developing over time. To gain the most insight on global warming, it would be wise to work alongside someone who is studying it themselves. Global warming is simply a matter of tracking trends and analyzing patterns to make inferences. If you are doing this, you are studying global warming,
The science of global warming could be a scam if someone had anything to gain by it. Yet scientists resisted the idea that they should be concerned about the possibility for almost a century after the possibility of anthropogenic global warming was first identified. No scientist has anything to gain by creating a hoax. In fact, any evidence that a research scientist has engaged in a scam would be career-destroying.
meteorology
If you were asked to speak in a debate, "Against man-made Global Warming" you would be arguing that man is not causing Global Warming. You would have to argue that Global Warming is occurring naturally.
no.the global warming won't benefit anyone
Anthropogenic global warming dates from the beginning of the industrial age, with average global temperatures rising only slowly at first, but accelerating since the 1970s. In 1930, anthropogenic global warming was barely perceptible and no scientist of the time would have considered the issue.
If global warming affects the ozone hole, the UV will come in. This will lead to more global warming.
No. Global warming is caused by man burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests. No other animal does that. If there were no humans on earth, there would be no global warming.
The end of global warming would help the ozone. It is because the depletion of ozone is directly related to the global warming caused by greenhouse gases.
The opposite would be global cooling.
No one would want to have global warming being caused by humans. That is not a logical position for anyone. Zero percent would WANT man induced global warming.
It would be global cooling.