Which of the following implies that an idea is absolutely true?
belief
hypothesis
theory
law
Which of the following statements about the Progressives is not true Interpretations of a story with a great deal of evidence that support them are better than those without supporting evidence.
Geologists subdivide geological periods into eras.
No, H1.9O1.9 is not a valid chemical formula as it implies fractional atoms which is not possible in formula representation. A chemical formula should represent whole numbers of atoms for each element.
True. More runoff can lead to increased erosion by carrying more sediment and pollutants away with it. This can be particularly problematic in areas with minimal vegetation or exposed soil.
True. Weather maps are used by scientists to analyze atmospheric conditions and make predictions about weather patterns. By studying factors such as temperature, pressure, and wind patterns on these maps, scientists can better understand and forecast changes in weather.
The effect occurs before the cause.
Well, obviously there are no "following statements", but I can tell you that: x+5x-2=18 implies 6x=20 implies x=20/6=10/3 x=10/3 ~ 3.333
Contrapositives are an idea in logic which is very useful in math.We say that A implies B if whenever Statement A is true then we know that statement B is also true.So, Say that A implies B, written:A -> BThe contrapositive of this statement is:Not-B -> Not-ARemember "A implies B" means that B must be true if A is true, so if we know that B is falce, we can deduce that A couldn't be true, so it must be falce.With truth tables it can easily be shown that"A -> B" IF AND ONLY IF "Not-B -> Not-A"So when using the contrapositive, no information is lost.In math, this is often used in proofs when, while trying to demonstrate that A implies B, it is easier to show that Not-B implies Not-A and hence that A implies B.
As the phrase, "true story" implies, these stories are, in fact, true!
Your question implies that you know the answer already. It implies you know He is One, and True. Yes, I think you answered your own question.
"Give credence to" means to believe or support something as being true or valid. It implies giving weight or significance to a particular idea or argument.
== == It means 'implies'. So A --> B means 'if A is true then B is true' or 'A implies B'
The principle of simplification in logic states that if a statement A implies B, then A can be considered sufficient on its own to support the truth of B. This means that knowing A is true allows us to deduce that B must also be true. The statement can be expressed as "If A, then B" (A → B), and the idea is that the truth of A leads directly to the truth of B. Thus, in a logical framework, A serves as a premise from which B logically follows.
It is absolutely not true.
"Far-fetched" has a negative connotation, suggesting that something is unlikely, improbable, or unrealistic. It implies that an idea or story is too difficult to believe or too improbable to be true.
The question implies that there is a list of statements of which one or more are true. In such circumstances would it be too much to expect that you make sure that there is something that is following?
Absolutely true