0
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
What else can I help you with?
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
What do scientists now know about earth that would have answered the scientists who rejected wegeners theory?
Scientists now know about plate tectonics, which explains how Earth's outer shell is divided into large plates that move and interact with each other. This understanding supports Wegener's theory of continental drift, as it provides a mechanism for the movement of continents over time. Additionally, evidence from ocean floor mapping, seafloor spreading, and magnetic striping further supports the concept of plate tectonics.
At first many scientists rejected Wegener and the hypothesis of continental drift. What was their main objection to his hypothesis?
The main objection to Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Wegener's idea of continents plowing through solid oceanic crust was not supported by scientific knowledge at that time, leading many scientists to reject his hypothesis.
How with so much evidence to support continental drift how could scientists reject the idea?
Some scientists rejected the idea of continental drift because Alfred Wegener, who proposed the theory, lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. In addition, the scientific community at the time held onto the prevailing belief in static continents and were resistant to accepting a new paradigm. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the 1960s that continental drift became widely accepted.
Describe what scientists now know about Earth that would have answered the scientists who rejected Wegener's theory?
Scientists now know about plate tectonics, which explains how the Earth's lithosphere is divided into plates that move and interact with each other. This knowledge would have answered the scientists who rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift because it provides a mechanism for how continents can drift and shift positions over time. Plate tectonics also explains various geological phenomena, such as earthquakes, volcanic activity, and the formation of mountain ranges.
The scientist of wegeners should have rejected his idea?
no because then they would know least about the world
Why most geologists rejected Alfred wegeners idea of continental drift?
dont ask me freak
What was the reason wegeners continental drift hypothesis was rejected?
His evidence was incorrect.
Why did other scientists not accept Alfred Wegeners theory?
why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory
What was the main reason wegeners continental drift was rejected?
He could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.
Where did scientists finally find evidence that supported wegeners ideas?
Mid-Ocean Ridge
Why were most scientists disagreeing with Alfred Wegeners continental drift theory?
There was no evidence to prove it
Why was the idea rejected by your coworker?
Your coworker rejected the idea because they believed it was not feasible or practical.
Why didn't scientists believe Alfred wegeners theory abotu contintal drift?
because he was a fat battyboy
Why was wegeners idea denied?
The scientific means for proving his hypothesis had not yet been developed.
What was the name of Alfred wegeners idea?
Plate tectonics, which refers to the concept of continental drift.
Was lamarcks idea of acquired traits proven or rejected?
rejected.
