Environmental groups do not necessarily oppose use of tidal energy, but in some cases they oppose the location that is proposed to make use of the energy. The opposition is usually based on negative effects it would have on wildlife and the environment.
There is a large tidal energy scheme at Rance in northern France. There are smaller ones in other parts of the world. Tidal mills were once fairly common in Britain. Tides are caused by the gravitational forces of the moon. These forces translate into high and low tides, on the earth. Tidal energy is transferred from the moon to the earth by tidal torque. This results in tidal lock. This is why you always see the same side of the moon
Wave or tidal energy is a great, environmentally friendly means of generating energy. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_power tidal energy is the best energy to use BUT there are a lot of con's to this source also so if you use this be generate of it.
Yes, there can be hidden environmental and social costs associated with tidal energy. These may include disruption to marine ecosystems from turbine installation, potential impacts on fish and marine life, and effects on local communities due to changes in wildlife or water flow patterns. It is important to conduct thorough assessments and engage with stakeholders to address and mitigate these potential costs.
Geothermal is taken from heat being made by the insides of the earth, usually in the form of hot springs and steam. Think Yellowstone. Tidal is taken from the changing of high tide to low tide and vise versa. It's a formal of hydroelectricity. Both of these are very "green" ways of harvesting energy unlike coal burning.
some inexhaustible resources are wind, water and the sun (solar power)
disruption of aquatic life in the area.
One drawback of tidal energy is its limited availability in certain locations with strong tidal currents. Additionally, the high capital costs associated with building and maintaining tidal energy facilities can be a disadvantage. Finally, potential environmental impacts on marine ecosystems and wildlife are also a concern for tidal energy development.
Tidal energy can face opposition due to the potential environmental impacts on marine ecosystems, disruption of tidal patterns, and concerns over the high installation and maintenance costs of tidal energy infrastructure. Additionally, community resistance may arise from the visual impact of tidal energy devices on coastlines and navigation routes.
Tidal energy is only available on the coast. Some locations are better than others for tidal energy because of the tidal range - for example, the North West of Australia has a very large tidal range.Converting tidal energy to electrical energy may require the construction of channels or barrages which may impact on the environment.
Tidal energy has a relatively low environmental impact compared to other sources of energy. It does not produce greenhouse gas emissions or air pollutants during operation. However, tidal energy devices can disrupt marine ecosystems, affect sediment transport, and potentially harm marine life if not properly planned and managed.
Tidal energy itself cannot be conserved, as it is a renewable resource that replenishes naturally with the ebb and flow of tides. However, the technology used to capture and convert tidal energy into electricity can be improved to be more efficient and sustainable. Efforts to minimize environmental impacts and maximize energy output from tidal sources can help in utilizing this renewable energy source effectively.
Tidal energy has several environmental impacts, both positive and negative. On the positive side, it produces clean, renewable energy with low greenhouse gas emissions, helping to combat climate change. However, the construction of tidal energy facilities can disrupt local ecosystems, affect marine life, and alter sediment transport and water flow patterns. Careful site selection and design are crucial to minimize these negative impacts while harnessing the benefits of tidal energy.
Conserving tidal energy presents challenges primarily due to the complexity of harnessing and storing energy from tidal movements. While tidal energy is predictable and environmentally friendly, the technology required to convert tidal movements into usable electricity is still developing. Additionally, constructing tidal energy infrastructure can be costly and may face regulatory and environmental hurdles. Overall, while the potential is significant, effective conservation and utilization require further advancements and investment.
Tidal and wave energy can have environmental impacts such as disturbance to marine ecosystems, changes in sediment transport, and potential harm to marine species due to collisions with turbines or disruption of habitats. However, compared to traditional fossil fuel sources, tidal and wave energy have lower greenhouse gas emissions and can help reduce reliance on polluting energy sources. Proper site selection and project design can help minimize negative environmental impacts.
Tidal energy has high initial infrastructure costs, limited suitable locations for tidal power plants, and environmental impacts on marine ecosystems. Additionally, the technology for harnessing tidal energy is still relatively new and not yet economically competitive with other renewable energy sources.
Harnessing tidal power is practical only in places where there are significant tidal ranges, such as coastal areas with strong tidal movements. Locations with narrow estuaries or bays can amplify tidal forces, making them ideal for tidal energy generation. Additionally, regions with stable coastal infrastructures and minimal environmental impact concerns are better suited for developing tidal energy projects.
tidal energy is created by turbines that does make tidal power