Silt settles out of water more readily in flat areas because there is less turbulence to keep it suspended. In flat land, water flow is usually slower, allowing silt particles to settle to the bottom. Silt is also more likely to accumulate in low-lying areas where water pools and has less opportunity to flow.
Clay holds more water than sand and silt. Clay particles are smaller and create a denser structure that can hold water more effectively than the larger particles of sand and silt.
Silt has larger particles than clay, so it typically absorbs water more slowly but can hold more water overall. Clay particles are smaller and have a higher surface area, so they absorb water quickly but may not retain as much water as silt in the long run.
Silt is a type of soil particle that is smaller than sand but larger than clay. It is formed from the weathering of rocks and is commonly found near bodies of water. While silt can contribute nutrients to soil, it is not a mix of rich soil and water in itself.
Sand is more permeable than silt because sand particles are larger with more spaces between them, allowing water to flow more easily through them. Silt particles are smaller and more compact, resulting in lower permeability.
Silt is a fine-grained sediment that falls between sand and clay in particle size. It is often transported by water and deposited in areas where the water flow slows down. Silt is fertile and often used in agriculture to improve soil quality for crops.
More silt is typically found in flatlands compared to mountains. Flatlands have more opportunity for sediment deposits to accumulate and settle, while mountains have rough terrain and faster water flow that can carry away silt more effectively.
I'm not a scientist but I myself, think that erosion is greater on a mountain slope. This is due to gravitational pull on soil, rocks, water... Being pulled down therefore, causing erosion. This is just my opinion.
Clay holds more water than sand and silt. Clay particles are smaller and create a denser structure that can hold water more effectively than the larger particles of sand and silt.
you can find silt in dirt. it is also found in streams & rivers when the water washes away some soil.
you can find silt in dirt. it is also found in streams & rivers when the water washes away some soil.
Silt has larger particles than clay, so it typically absorbs water more slowly but can hold more water overall. Clay particles are smaller and have a higher surface area, so they absorb water quickly but may not retain as much water as silt in the long run.
I know for a fact silt is found along the banks of the Nile after a flood
Silt is one type of material found on the bottom of a stream. Silt is fine and can be carried along in moving water, but is heavyier than water, so settles out of the water as it slows. It can be organic or mineral.
Yes, water can pass through silt because silt has small particles that allow water to flow through them. However, the rate at which water passes through silt will depend on the porosity and permeability of the silt particles.
Silt is a type of soil particle that is smaller than sand but larger than clay. It is formed from the weathering of rocks and is commonly found near bodies of water. While silt can contribute nutrients to soil, it is not a mix of rich soil and water in itself.
Sand is more permeable than silt because sand particles are larger with more spaces between them, allowing water to flow more easily through them. Silt particles are smaller and more compact, resulting in lower permeability.
Silt is a fine-grained sediment that falls between sand and clay in particle size. It is often transported by water and deposited in areas where the water flow slows down. Silt is fertile and often used in agriculture to improve soil quality for crops.