Rome's unstable government, characterized by frequent changes in leadership and civil strife, severely undermined economic stability. Political turmoil led to inconsistent policies, corruption, and a lack of effective governance, discouraging trade and investment. Additionally, heavy taxation and inflation, exacerbated by military expenditures and reliance on foreign mercenaries, further strained the economy, causing widespread hardship among citizens. Ultimately, this instability contributed to the decline of Rome's economic power and the eventual fall of the empire.
No ruler corrupt economy
no it is not
GUCCI
the economy suffered from inflation a drastic drop in the value of money and a raise in prices.
they put less.
No ruler corrupt economy
augustus changed it by being smart and ending war
Rome did not have any economy stupid people read histories book hahahaha
We have the same type and form of the Roman empire today, with three branches
augustus changed it by being smart and ending war
augustus changed it by being smart and ending war
augustus changed it by being smart and ending war
augustus changed it by being smart and ending war
augustus changed it by being smart and ending war
How did Rome's location affect its development
Roman is the proper adjective for Rome.
Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.Ancient Rome was a republic. They had a government that was elected by the people.