Want this question answered?
well, it depends on what type of global crisis it is...
Hoover was not give the chance to solve the nation's economic crisis. He lost the election to Franklin Roosevelt. When an economic downturn occurs, people blame the president and vote for the opposition. They figure that a change is in order and Roosevelt capitalized on the situation, blaming Hoover and make wild promises to fix the problem. As often happens in such situation, a new Congress rode in on his coat tails and rubber-stamped all of his programs, even those that were unconstitutional.
stop spending, start saving
chicser
Inflation
No way. The US would never let a dictator run their country to solve a problem.
I hope it will possible to solve.
It will solve the economic crisis that has affected the US and the whole world
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
Caesar held the position of Dictator when he was murdered. Usually a man was appointed Dictator for a stated time--just to solve the current crisis and then he gave up the power. However, Caesar was appointed Dictator for life, by a weak, groveling Senate, thus giving the conspirators another one of their many reasons to kill him.
A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.
The Roman government changed during emergencies in order to get the crisis solved. Many times the consuls and the senate could not agree on a solution or a reaction to the emergency so they appointed a dictator who had full power to solve the problem.
Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it!
Near bills house but you need to solve the power plant crisis first.
See http://www.cfr.org/publication/9663
well, it depends on what type of global crisis it is...
Security vulnerabilities can create a crisis for software. To solve this, developers must release a software patch which will fix the issue.